Activity Stream

This is gold : https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/07/royal-commentators-hoaxed-into-critique-of-meghan-interview-before-seeing-it

1368346680047767556

1367877688954880000 Top secret clearance. Classic conservative with impressive impulse control

https://newsthump.com/2021/03/04/buckingham-palace-to-investigate-claims-that-meghan-bullied-prince-andrew-into-having-sex-with-teenage-girls/

1368248282179395588 Impressive. Especially considering it takes three weeks for a vaccine to reach full efficacy, then another couple of weeks for...

So if names don't matter, lets name the virus the Trump virus, since it's during his administration the virus raged in the US. Lets name the cure,...

I did read the article which is why I knew the snippet from the Tweet was only a tiny part of the article and not the point of it - yet you ran off...

Like I said, one of us—namely you—has a well-established record of not reading, and one of us—namely me—has a well-established record of reading. You...

Its the only possible reaction. The chinless wonders in the Palace did the same thing to Diana thirty years ago. They're pathetic and it backfired...

You know very well that they won't be axed any time soon. So no, that's not a sufficient reaction to the situation at hand.

:rolleyes: Quite clear you've ran halfcocked yet again. Getting people not to flee France in dangerous boats in deadly conditions is a good thing...

No RB, unlike you, I actually read things, and that's one reason why I don't believe the UK gearing up to break international humanitarian law is...

Not ignoring it. I've said they should be axed. Is there any more serious sanction that can be proposed than that?

You're still ignoring that an institute under the responsibility of your Government is involved in systemic bullying.

Yes the entire article and if you had read the entire article it is very good news from start to finish matching what I have said here for years. ...

If you had read the article, you would've realized I am addressing something that is in the article. Have you read it? Or have you "read" it in your...

You're responding to the snippet of the Tweet. Did you read the article?

Does it increase their knowledge? No. Does it amplify and target emotional response? Yes.

Getting them out of the position solves the problem just fine. Getting involved in tabloid trash is beneath us.

As we have already established, unlike you—a functionally illiterate clown—I read the things I link to, before linking to them. Asylum seekers in the...

Untill Brexit happened I had a subscription to the Daily Telegraph. They have a lot of royal coverage and I noticed the extremely aggressive...

Do you think Trump calling it the China virus made people more aware that the pandemic came from China? What people living under a rock didn't know...

Hazir, you're paying any attention to the British monarchy. . . why?

Your being a republican doesn't change a jot or tittel to the fact that a family, propped up with your tax money, uses its vast influence to attack a...

No I don't. I am a republican, I'd rather see the monarchy abolished and certainly don't want to engage in celebrity tittle tattle about people...

So you agree with the Windsors protecting someone suspected of child abuse but go out of their way to hang out a Black woman for being mouthy and...

Excellent, well written article. Did you actually read the article you chose to share or did you react in outrage to a Tweet and not read the article?

Do we really? Pass thanks.

It's an extremely toxic and fucked-up institution, but not more so than the English public. They're playing to their audience.