The effects of remilitarizing the Israel-Egyptian border
As you all undoubtedly know, a fairly complex terror attack was carried out in Israel near the border with Egypt today. It was a combined shooting-mortar-rocket attack on various vehicles near the border; most of the casualties came when they shot an anti-tank missile at a private car. It is not surprising; Israeli commentators have been speculating for months that terror groups were operating with relative impunity in the Sinai desert through a combination of Egyptian disinterest with a confrontation and their focus on the revolution and other internal matters. In the meantime, IDF intelligence has hinted at a significant stepping-up of weapons shipments to Gaza from the Sinai desert and increased organization of local Islamist organizations. It appears that most control of the Sinai has been ceded (at least temporarily) to the various clans living in the desert, despite the fact that the Egyptian army has had a significantly increased presence in the Sinai since the revolution (Israel agreed to let them increase their forces in the Sinai in contravention of the Camp David Accords, ostensibly in return for some level of security on the border).
This comes at a sensitive time in Israeli politics. 'Tent' protestors, who among other things demand a reduction in the defense budget to fund cheaper housing, have shelved IDF plans for further investment in acquisitions. In the meantime, sporadic flare-ups along the border with Gaza have rattled southern residents... and there's always the ever-present concern of what will happen in September when the Palestinians attempt to declare a state again (another intifada? mass protests? nothing?).
For most of the last 30-odd years, the IDF has had the luxury of reducing its prioritization of the border with Egypt, formerly a heavily militarized region taking a good chunk of IDF strength. In recent years, the occasional terror infiltration coupled with increasing numbers of African refugees streaming across the border (not to mention drugs/etc.) has slightly raised the border in its importance, and Israel has begun the construction of a sophisticated border fence system along the long, geographically challenging border. Yet events today put a whole new complexion on the issue. It is likely the defense budget won't be touched in any changes as a result of the protests, and fortifying of the border will undoubtedly be prioritized in the budget. More worrisome, Israel is talking about significantly increasing military strength along the border, establishing an independent military command for the region, and dusting off its contingency planning for conflicts with Egypt. I doubt they're interested in a confrontation with Egypt, but I don't doubt they'll consider small cross-border strikes against terrorist cells if this escalates. Not a good combination, given Egypt's own professed ambivalence about the treaty with Israel.
What do you guys think? Obviously this is very speculative right now, but that's one border that has enjoyed a huge peace dividend for decades. Upsetting that delicate balance may not have been the terrorists' objective (more likely they were frustrated at the lack of success in carrying out attacks from Gaza), but it is certainly a worrisome outcome.