Printable View
Question: which conspiracy theory was advocated in this thread? Or is posting about an old news event grounds for thread closure now?Quote:
Kat, for the past few years we've let you post your insanity as long as you weren't starting new threads every few weeks with the latest rambling. If you want to start a mega-thread of conspiracies that's fine, but you can't create thread after thread of this stuff.
Also, this was a year ago and is currently being prosecuted. Thread closed.
Shit, i mean "Site Discussion" not "Article Draft" could a moderator move pls.
Thanks, I was wondering the same thing. I suppose I could see it moving to a police brutality megathread or something, but closure on the basis of "insanity"? Hmm no.
Yes pleaseQuote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
"New York moderator beats innocent thread to death" :mad:
Maybe he was trying to comply with the repeated requests some of our posters have made to keep Kathaksung confined to a single thread if the mods won't ban him entirely?
He's made like two threads.
What Fuzzy said.
If Kat were legitimately interested in starting and engaging in a discussion about the things he posts, our relationship with him would be different. But his style has always been to post a stream of quasi-nonsense about US government treachery, without any further engagement on the subject that he's posting on.
Posting about US government treachery is fine, and I totally support people discussing that. But we all know Kat isn't interested in discussing that. So, since the days of Atard, we've always made him stick to one or two threads. Otherwise he would probably fill the place up.
PS- Kat's made maybe 4-7 threads. He has two accounts here, because he spends all his time posting this stuff on other forums and forgets his usernames.
He should invest in a browser that remembers usernames/passwords. Maybe we can do a fundraiser on his behalf? :bulb:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnaught
Should we target the price point for IE, Firefox, or Chrome?