Originally Posted by
Steely Glint
Failure to learn a thing or two after 30 years+ in Westminster is stretching even his stubbornness a little, though.
And it's clear that his calculations about what was needed to do well in this election were a hell of a lot closer to the mark than May's. He was able to close the credibility gap a little with a fully costed manifesto, he was able to successfully identify and exploit voter concerns about Tory cuts, especially to the NHS and in the wake of the two terrorist attacks, police numbers and he was able to energise and turn out a substantial youth vote. He is an effective public speaker. Not quite up to Blair or Obama standards, but better than Brown or Milliband.
May, on the other hand, profoundly miscalculated on several levels:
* Decided to alienate an important part of the Tory base (old people) for no reason
* Assumed UKIP voters would all come over to the Tories - they didn't. Not after Corbyn said he'd carry out Brexit and end free movement.
* Didn't turn up for debates
* gave the impression that she was making a bee-line for a hard Brexit for no reason, even when it's not clear that's what a substantial number of Leave voters actually want and it certainly isn't what Remainers want (and there are 48% of us, remember)
* Just generally took a the electorate for granted
* over focused on Corbyn's character, IRA links and so forth.
* wasted campaign effort on the NE of England, where the Tories achieved a swing but still didn't actually gain seats.
So who really lacks political nous?