That doesn't get you 50% of the vote.
Printable View
That doesn't get you 50% of the vote.
How about a children's toy?
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-...cash--20120323
Looks like Paul might not be so high-minded after all.
No, his campaign manager was lying. :noob:
Is he the god idol to replace Obama? All criticism out of bounds, even when not meant to criticize?
It was in reference to Cain's earlier remark that Paul is too principled to run as VP.
Sure does. But that doesn't help much in bumfuck Texas, where his congressional district is.
So, in addition to :bulb: to the rest (a campaign manager saying someone could "potentially" be "looking" for something is about as non-committal a statement as you can make), what is it you think Ron Paul's goals and principles are?
Not on issues but in case of the way his fan base works he's like UKIP or BOO (Better Off Out) Tories at home. A bunch of hardcore fanatics spread out across the country (and making a ton of noise on the Internet). But in reality never that many in an individual place and despite a number of false dawns no real chance of getting a plurality of the votes to get elected.
Excluding the crazy loser-takes-most PR system we use in Europe elections obviously. Or that's equivalent to winning a few delegates as they're not winner takes all anymore, but still no chance of getting a majority.
Read the comments on Loki's link LOL. Either Paul's going to win on delegates or he's cheated out of it. Read the comments on British political sides and you'd think everyone was UKIP/BOO.
It's interesting that Lewk's "public transit is socialism" analysis has gained such traction.
Rubio has been rumored to be a likely candidate for months now. Many Hispanic groups are a natural base for Republicans in lots of ways, were it not for their unfortunate inability to take the right stand on expanding immigration (EG the Hispanic quadrant of my family would fits demo/political profile very well).
Except that the Democrats aren't any better in their stance on immigration when it comes right down to it (can't have a bunch of wetbacks mooching off their cherished social programs), so it's kind of a given that immigrants are gonna get screwed, so the Republican platform really is better aligned with the interests of immigrants than the Democratic one, hence the strong Latino base.
How do you figure that? Democrats, as a group, are more supportive of the Dream Act. They're also more likely to support things like public education and healthcare for everyone, regardless of proven citizenship, or ability to pay in private markets. Those are the things that attract immigration to the USA in the first place.
With my twin super-human abilities of cognition and ability to observe events.
What actual steps or results have Democrats taken to make immigration (or the life of immigrants already in this country) easier in the last 20 years or so? Contrast with the consequences of their policies that have made immigration a great deal more difficult, and you end up with the knowledge that if anything, the Democrats have made immigration and being an immigrant more difficult and more miserable.
The Republicans don't articulate their position well —*they seem to be unable to credibly say they want to defend the border and encourage immigration with sane immigration policies. They tend to focus on the border patrols and less on how important immigrants are to our society. Not to mention getting into fights over "official languages".
Then again, many Democrats aren't able to credibly say they want to protect the border. And their hope is the newcomers get hooked on big-state social programs and see government as a tool of advancement, much like the left-wing sees government service/programs as tools for African-American advancement (instead of the private sector).
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0406234458.htm
I think this is relevant to Santorum. :o
pfft, it's probably relevant to a majority of US men in powerful positions. Older men have great difficulty accepting anything remotely homo-erotic, and "try too hard to prove" their heterosexual orientation. Sometimes by trying to enact laws like DADT or DOMA. Or it's "thinly veiled" in religious doctrine, and perpetuated by the Vatican, even though the Roman Catholic Church has been exposed as a cesspool of pedophilia.
:rolleyes:
But according to latest research, dinosaurs were fabulous, dahhling. Dunno about the self-loathing, though
To paraphrase Chris Keller, you don't need hands to be gay, just a mouth to suck with...
Bah...that's SO one dimensional.
Santorum is finally out.
Must have been the gay study that drove him out. :o
Good riddance.
This is the day the magic died :(