This self-pwn is savage but it's what happens when dudes read like RB.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D_sDh4XX...g&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D_sDh5jX...g&name=900x900
Printable View
This self-pwn is savage but it's what happens when dudes read like RB.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D_sDh4XX...g&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D_sDh5jX...g&name=900x900
RB voted for these jokers:
Twitter Link
I'm sure he's going to deny voting for any of the Brexitards. He always denies any responsibility for Brexit's negative effects.
Good to see though she's consistent. Obviously she didn't know what that iPad was for and she made certain she stayed ignorant.
I voted for the UK not to have any MEPs. If what I voted for occurs then she is a nobody who won't be elected to represent anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
LOL at Barnier calling our Prime Minister 'combatitive': https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49118107
Not got pathetic lickspittle May to speak to anymore now.
You seem to have missed the fact that calling your PM 'combative' can hardly be considered diplomatic discourse.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
Also that the message was that the WA is not up for renegotiation. So that any proposal will have to be compatible with the agreement as it stands.
Your posts are like reading boomer MAGA Facebook posts with a strong English accent :haha:
You think I wanted diplomatic discourse?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazir
The agreement is dead and needs to be renegotiated. Your choice if you want to continue beating a dead horse rather than actually engaging.
A plurality of voters, 45%, now back Leaving on October 31st with No Deal according to the poll, 28% want to cancel Brexit and Remain in the EU, just 13% want to delay Brexit and extend again until a Deal can get through the Commons.
https://www.opinium.co.uk/wp-content...-July-2019.pdf
That's like the worst song ever. How appropriate :p
All we need to do is wait for November 1st to come around. You won't be eating any cake though. Unlimited quantities of humble pie will be available on the other hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
Lmao, so most voters don't agree to a No Deal Brexit and just over half want an end to austerity :haha:
I'm happy to wait for 1 November. Tic toc, tic toc.
How's that Irish border going to be for you on 1 November?
As I said, you just seem to want to have bombs going off in London, you asshat.
If there any killings? That's directly on your ilk.
Nope if there's any killings its directly on the murderers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khendraja'aro
Indirectly its on your ilk for seeking to exploit a border on a sectarian basis.
The GFA was on the basis of consent across sectarian lines and there is no consent for the undemocratic backstop.
It's gonna be so much fun to see Project Fear go live :)
Agreed. Seeing project fear run into reality is going to be fun. :)
So much for your trade agreements.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...liticians-warn
Considering the undemocratic backstop violates the GFA, lacks cross-sectarian consent, removes civil liberties and risks driving people to violence it is a good job we are adamantly against it then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khendraja'aro
Unless you are still so ignorant, moronic and naive as to think only one side is capable of violence?
You really are a moron of the highest order. Congratulations.
"Considering the undemocratic backstop violates the GFA"
That's so idiotic it's a blackhole of stupidity. But do go on. Show us the passages of the GFA which prohibit the backstop. Please.
Yeah, what I thought: Just a load of hot air you directly inhaled from your Idiot-In-Chief BoJo.
Rand, who is going to be negotiating these trade deals according to your Brexit ideals? You blamed May for failure, so does that mean any success is now up to Boris? :confused:
Twitter Link
:haha: :haha: :haha:
Oh man, I needed a good laugh :haha: :up: so dumb, even by the Spectator's standards.
Did you read the article or just the Twitter quotation?
I think the tongue is firmly in cheek but it is an interesting point.
Of course I read the article, and it's either super dumb or just extraordinarily mendacious. That's on top of the painfully puffed-up affronted indignation that is the Spectator opinion writer's bread and butter. Nelson, that shameless exploiter of derpheads, is counting on readers being too dumb to read on to eg. the very next paragraph.
I don't think you completely get this journalism malarkey.
Nelson is the editor of the Spectator. When he posts a link to an article it doesn't mean he is agreeing with the article. He also linked to the article by Ivan Rogers in the Spectator that Charles Day disagreed with.
No, the article is so extraordinarily dumb that the decision to publish it—and to further publicize it on Twitter through a personal account—should be regarded as evidence of editorial deficiency. There's a distinction between reasonable differences of opinion and outright garbage.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
So, Rand, I'm still waiting on your explanation on how the backstop violates the GFA.
Exact details, please. You know, lines, paragraphs and all that jazz.