Freshly brushed teeth give you a positive reading on a blow test. I have first hand experience of that. The reading was well over the legal limit where the last time I had touched any alcohol was 48 hours before (1 glass of wine).
Printable View
Yeah, but only right after right? We tested one at high school and all readings like that dropped very quickly after, so a second test shortly after was okay. And when the ANWB tested, a guy who had 8 or 9 beers still did not test positive..
I remember reading about a lawyer who found that even minuscule amounts of alcohol present in the mouth, (it can appear much later if the person being tested burps) can throw a monkey wrench in the readings. In short, the breathalyzer was a great way of testing the amount of alcohol in the mouth, but not so great at testing the amount of alcohol in the blood.
Of course, this was a godless defense lawyer, and he pretty much gets paid to lie.
Another step too far in searches...
Sigh.
Jebus...so as long as the phone is not on my person it's safe??? Idiocy.
Try to wash it off then next time, silly mang. It's not meant to stay on your teeth or in your mouth.
...just like soap needs to be washed off the hands. I don't like the smell of your digusting soap, people! Aside aside: dove is great for people who love smelling like chemicals. It's nearly impossible to wash off.
...just like shampoo needs to be rinsed off. I don't like the smell of your apricot/nutmeg/chemical terror hair filling the room, people!
God.
So...if your phone has a password combination on it, are you obligated to give the police your code when they detain you?
Theoretically, the password doesn't exist inside the phone, and neither do the unencrypted messages.
I'm not sure I follow what you're getting at...
I don't think you'd have to, since you don't have to provide them with your computer password either afaik.
encryption and passwords are protected under the 5th amendment. We had a child porn case revolve that exact concept come to a close last year. The defendent lost, but the judge made it clear it was because the content was already viewable when it was inspected. He would not have been forced to hand over the information if the device was powered off or locked when it was inspected.
However, the government is also allowed to copy your device contents, and if you don't provide the pass, I've seen nothing that says they are not allowed to brute force it.