Well then let's use another source: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellsch...-14353098.html
But I am sure there is something wrong with the FAZ as well.
Printable View
Well then let's use another source: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellsch...-14353098.html
But I am sure there is something wrong with the FAZ as well.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/econo...d65045e65e141dQuote:
Originally Posted by Khendraja'aro
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/75...igrants-crisis
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7057416.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...a-1091681.html
No idea what sources you consider valid but there is pretty much zero doubt that sexual assault has increased since you let in a bunch of people who view women a lot differently than Westerners.
It's funny, I was listening to a couple of little old ladies talking about this and they were incredulous that people today seem to be unaware that hundreds of people have gotten groped and dozens assaulted or outright raped at every single major fucking festival since they were young, which I believe was in the 60s.Another old lady wrote to a newspaper with a similar observation and there's been a lot of puzzled wondering about why there hasn't been an uproar about this very real problem until just recently.
Denial is sad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
Your hypocrisy is sad.
Are you attempting to blame the victims for not complaining before now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
What?
Please clarify your question and your thinking because on the face of it it seems so dumb that I fear I may not be interpreting your post fairly and accurately.
You're wondering why there is an uproar now and not before. I'm wondering what your point is. People are complaining now, this behaviour is unacceptable and the victims are right to complain.
Are you suggesting that:
Today's victims are wrong to complain?
Previous year's victims were to blame for not complaining?
Or something else?
Okay so it was as dumb as it appeared to be. I was referring, again, as I have done previously, to the phony outrage of bigoted non-victims (ie. not those who are assaulted but rather those hypocritical observers such as Lewk, Trump and yourself whose primary interest is in chauvinism and point-scoring) who could never be bothered to give a fuck until it became associated with Muslim migrants.
I would rather see some prove for such a claim.
Which claim?
How about the claim that there is phony outrage? I've always been outraged by abuse wherever it occurs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
That one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
Well, proof about Trump isn't hard to find, do you really want me to post those for you? But I imagine you meant the allegation about yourself .
A pretty malicious and unfounded allegation don't you think.
Trump is so nuts, you can use him as straw-man for about anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Flixy
Easy: Brown people are not allowed to harass white people. That's the job of white people.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
Nobody is allowed to harass anyone.
The far right is leading the outrage brigade. When did the far right ever protest rape or mistreatment of women in the past?
2004 the a right wing women organization along with the SVP had a successful initiative to have a lifetime sentence for sexual offenders with no change of therapy.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verwahrung_(Schweiz)
Yes. And yet, the same men and women who previously turned a blind eye towards such harassment now loudly proclaim the downfall of civilization, now that some brown people are caught doing the same stuff that has been the prerogative of whitie before them.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
Noone with a sane mind is thinking that all refugees and migrants are saints. They have, on the other hand, not shown to be more of a problem than the people who have been here since about forever.
The AFD is a prominent example for their cognitive dissonance: They're leading a campaign to get women back into the kitchen while their party leader actually is a woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Wanting to punish rapists isn't the same as wanting to support victims of rape or women in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by earthJoker
It isn't meant as punishment, the text of the initiative clearly states that the life sentence is meant as protection of further victims additionally to the punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
For some reason the far left which Loki seems to be rushing headlong to join can't comprehend that releasing criminals with a high recidivism rate creates more and more victims.Quote:
Originally Posted by earthJoker
Probably one of a most frequently used and vile ad hominem attacks on this site. You're basically saying we have no problem with sexual assault unless it can be used to score political points. That's pretty fucked up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
http://theworldforgotten.com/showthr...ghlight=rapistQuote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Oh lookie here it was the liberals who are opposed to mandatory 'harsh' sentencing of rapists.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...before-release
"Steve Hurst, a Republican from Munford, Ala., has introduced a bill that would require sex offenders older than 21 to pay for their own surgical castration before being released from state custody."
Just like in the case that lead to the initiative. You can read all of it here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mord_am_Zollikerberg (German only, you can try a translator).Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade
Was it ever reported in English-language headlines? You're being unreasonable Minx.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
Another example of Rand not knowing what the hell he's talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandBlade