Sure, but I don't think I'd charge them with murder.
Printable View
Sure, but I don't think I'd charge them with murder.
Who said anything about nearly eliminating the risk? Not me. Today even with the so-called "trigger happy" cops, a cop dies on average by firearms alone every single week in the USA. Most years (though sadly not 2017) no cops die from any violent means let alone just firearms in the UK. America's f***ed up.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/2/16...y-toxic-fandom
Excerpt for our police apologists here:
Also:Quote:
n Wichita, the local police force defended the killing of the unarmed Finch by saying that he didn’t hold his hands the right way when he answered the door and appeared to be reaching for something.
These sorts of familiar excuses for police violence are often buttressed by stern lectures from officers and random tweeters alike to always act thus-and-so around cops. But why must American citizens be drilled in reacting with military stoicism to having guns pointed in their faces — especially African-Americans, who bear the brunt of unwarranted police violence?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ther-countries
Quote:
Fact: In the first 24 days of 2015, police in the US fatally shot more people than police did in England and Wales, combined, over the past 24 years.
Honestly make those kinds of comparisons is silly unless you look at how many police officers have been killed in England and Wales.
Lewk, you never miss an opportunity to "hope" for revenge, or use the police and/or penal system to inflict pain (even torture, or death), do you? Your quest for Law and Order is undone every time you say shit like that. :rolleyes:
Instead of calling for better technology (that would help first responders do a better job), or better police protocols (that could save innocent lives), you jump to the lowest level of Fear & Consequences. No wonder "Fry 'em" is practically your middle name
Riiight. Fits in with your binary views. Only two types of people in the world, and one way to deal with them.....:rolleyes:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/02...r-charged.html
Attorney: Family of 'swatting' victim wants officer charged
In a letter Tuesday, Finch's mother, Lisa Finch, says officials are compounding the family's grief by not allowing her to see her son's body or returning it for burial.
From what is coming out via the family members that survived, this is starting to sound like a coverup similar to how the police handled killing John Crawford. They handcuffed the family after the shooting, interrogated and intimidated them, took their cell phones and computers. Its ridiculous.
Strange cover up given its got widespread publicity.
I'd have thought taking evidence would be standard at this stage and with this being an online hoax the computers could have evidence on them. When they don't they'll be returned.
No I don't think cover ups happen very often at all. Anyone can get on Twitter nowadays.
No I don't think cover ups happen very often at all. Anyone can get on Twitter nowadays.
Oh they operate in a different way? I mean to be sure people don't just do bad stuff just to do bad stuff, they do it for some gain or perceived gain. But ultimately those without a moral compass that prevents them from doing bad things will only not do bad things because the effort is greater than than the value they perceive it to be. The consequences are what keeps the savages in line.