Crypto Madness

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Loki

So you're really riled up at the government regulating a behavior that neither you nor most law-abiding citizens actually engage in?

---

This IS Lewk. He is someone who, despite championing using a flat sales tax rather than an income tax, loudly objected to the idea of there being a sales-tax on very high end luxury items like trips to space. Making use of a sales tax is only moral to him if it is primarily used to ensure the poor stay poor. This is more of the same. And it actually makes sense, when you consider how he thinks about incentives and disincentives. Welfare is wrong because it's not about disincentivizing being poor. The way welfare should work is the government should be taking from the poor and giving to the rich, as an incentive to the poor to become rich themselves and stop being poor.

Sounds like an economic version of Stockholm syndrome.

A deflationary currency would create generational wealth inequality so extreme even the boomers would look at it and be, like, 'jeez'. You're already fucked if you buy in at the current price of $40k and you're trying to compete with someone who brought in at $40 dollars, which in the sociopathic logic of libertarian-cryptobroism I guess you deserve it for not being "smart" enough to buy in when bitcoin was cheap, but if bitcoin's deflationary mechanics work as intended then future generations will *never* have the chance to buy in at $40 or even $40k. The bitcoin rich and then, presumably, their children would form a kind of new aristocracy. And this is the future bitcoiners want. They brag about it.

You take a superficial look at bitcoin, you see at best a technological novelty with a few interesting ideas and at worse a pointless waste of time, it's remarkable just how dystopian it gets, and how fast, when you really dig into the mechanics of it.

We should be thankful the technology is garbage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy

This IS Lewk. He is someone who, despite championing using a flat sales tax rather than an income tax, loudly objected to the idea of there being a sales-tax on very high end luxury items like trips to space. Making use of a sales tax is only moral to him if it is primarily used to ensure the poor stay poor. This is more of the same. And it actually makes sense, when you consider how he thinks about incentives and disincentives. Welfare is wrong because it's not about disincentivizing being poor. The way welfare should work is the government should be taking from the poor and giving to the rich, as an incentive to the poor to become rich themselves and stop being poor.

---

If you want less of something you tax, if you want more of something you subsidize it. Why do you want less success?

Jesus Christ, this is a new low.



I mean, I know there are some shady people in crypto but those two? Come on.

Their private jets don't pay for themselves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steely Glint

A deflationary currency would create generational wealth inequality so extreme even the boomers would look at it and be, like, 'jeez'. You're already fucked if you buy in at the current price of $40k and you're trying to compete with someone who brought in at $40 dollars, which in the sociopathic logic of libertarian-cryptobroism I guess you deserve it for not being "smart" enough to buy in when bitcoin was cheap, but if bitcoin's deflationary mechanics work as intended then future generations will *never* have the chance to buy in at $40 or even $40k. The bitcoin rich and then, presumably, their children would form a kind of new aristocracy. And this is the future bitcoiners want. They brag about it.

You take a superficial look at bitcoin, you see at best a technological novelty with a few interesting ideas and at worse a pointless waste of time, it's remarkable just how dystopian it gets, and how fast, when you really dig into the mechanics of it.

We should be thankful the technology is garbage.

---

I lean towards this view :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Loki

So you're really riled up at the government regulating a behavior that neither you nor most law-abiding citizens actually engage in?

---

If the government banned mohawks I'd still be against it and I don't have an investment in mohawks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steely Glint

And this is the future bitcoiners want.

---

They wanna hook up with girls in junior high, that's about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steely Glint

So, if you imagine there was a big concert for a major artist and obviously there's limit supply of those so you need to snap them up quick because it's Kanye or Taylor Swift or something, and there's 100s of thousands of people trying to get them at the same time... how high do you think gas would get, with everyone trying to outbid each other to get their transaction through faster? You'd be paying maybe 10x-100x more than the actual price of the ticket in gas?

---

https://i.redd.it/cdqf79lc8sw81.png

What in the name of hell am I looking at here :confused:

What you're looking at there is a spike in transaction fees ("gas") on Ethereum in the early hours of this morning, London time. Specifically, for several hours it was $3859 for a NFT sale, $3519 to exchange one cryptocurrency with another cryptocurrency and $1032 to transfer some Tether. This was because, I guess, some people were trying to buy some new NFTs all at once or something.

The irony of this is that on this air quotes "decentralised" system a spike in demand for one product renders the entire network effectively unusable for several hours until the transaction costs have calmed down.

This is with a miniscule (compared to the global banking industry) amount of transactions being processed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dreadnaught

What in the name of hell am I looking at here :confused:

---

Here's a decent article on what happened:

https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/1/23...eeds-yuga-labs

Also note Ethereum transactions and Bitcoin transactions are separate chains. There are other cryptocurrencies that have different types of processes so called light weight currencies like Mina protocol or Vechain won't ever have Etherum type high gas fees. Bitcoin also created a layered solution through the Lightning Network that allows millions of transactions a second.

Quote:

---

A number of users also reported losing thousands of dollars to gas fees in failed transactions.

---

Oh yeah, I forgot about this. If the cost of the transaction exceeds the amount you bid for gas at the time the transaction is processed then the transaction just fails with an 'out of gas' error and you still lose the gas fee.

This is intended behaviour. I have no words.

Quote:

---

Bitcoin also created a layered solution through the Lightning Network that allows millions of transactions a second.

---

Lightning Network just shifts the cost/inefficiency of the blockchain from transactions themselves to the act of opening and closing a channel.

This fails to solve any problem we currently have in the financial system while creating a whole lot of new ones (unpredictability, high transaction costs, the potential all your money will be stolen, the potential of you forgetting your password). How any reasonable person is into this is beyond me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Loki

This fails to solve any problem we currently have in the financial system while creating a whole lot of new ones (unpredictability, high transaction costs, the potential all your money will be stolen, the potential of you forgetting your password). How any reasonable person is into this is beyond me.

---

Out of curiosity what do you think the solution is to government control of fait? Oh wait what am I thinking, Loki you *want* the government to be able to shut down anyone's bank account if they disapprove of the behavior.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lewkowski

Out of curiosity what do you think the solution is to government control of fait? Oh wait what am I thinking, Loki you *want* the government to be able to shut down anyone's bank account if they disapprove of the behavior.

---

You mean the way Russians had their crypto wallets frozen at the beginning of the current war?

How odd. You approved of the government doing exactly that, without recourse to the courts, when it was introduced back in 2001. As part of the Patriot Act.

But it has absolutely nothing to do with fiat currency. You could be using gold and the government could still do the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lewkowski

Loki you *want* the government to be able to shut down anyone's bank account if they disapprove of the behavior.

---

You want them to kill people because they disapprove of their behaviour (i.e. they do a crime), or at the very least deprive them of their liberty, but shutting down their bank account is a bridge too far?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Loki

You mean the way Russians had their crypto wallets frozen at the beginning of the current war?

---

Only on exchanges, you can't freeze a personal wallet.

Honestly, fuck these people

https://www.dlnews.com/articles/peop...-bitcoin-mine/

Generally agreed, but honest question: are all data centers very noisy? Is this one unique in its shitty cooling system?

All data centres are noisy, but it would normally be mostly hidden from the outside world by sound-proofing techniques. Since Bitcoin miners are after the cheapest electricity possible, spending a bunch extra on sound-mitigation probably doesn't appeal, especially as they move around a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steely Glint

All data centres are noisy, but it would normally be mostly hidden from the outside world by sound-proofing techniques. Since Bitcoin miners are after the cheapest electricity possible, spending a bunch extra on sound-mitigation probably doesn't appeal, especially as they move around a lot.

---

So, true to form, bitcoin miners are just jerks.