Not to mention that this was an inevitable result of Ginsburg refusing to retire.Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy
Not to mention that this was an inevitable result of Ginsburg refusing to retire.Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy
Let's not forget:
McConnell blocking Obama's pick
Pushing through a sexual predator
Ramming through RBGs replacement days before an election
Nobody doing anything about Thomas hiding his wife's involvement in the insurrection.
Yeah okay but scorpions gonna scorpionQuote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
Well of course they are all satisfied. They wanted this. And Ginsburg is dead so she can't see it. But Kennedy let himself be convinced he could retire because Trump admired his legacy, and I agree with GGT that this Court has dismantling a bunch of other "it's MY body and MY life" protections on their agenda. Material largely relying on jurisprudence written by Kennedy. Although, oddly enough, abortion itself is probably where he waffled the most himselfQuote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
LMAO there was zero evidence aside from a completely unreliable account from a political partisan that he was a sexual predator. You would think in a post Jussie Smollett and Amber Heard world that people would have a little more discernment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/04...cal-abortions/
This shit just keeps getting funnier, 10/10 entertainment value.
Reading sources like that is why you are what you are, Lewk. The attempt to rationalize the use of ivermectin shouts stupidity or gullibility.
It's almost like he is showing why legal access to abortions is so important. He is soooo close to self awareness.
Then you realize that his entire political stance is based on whatever makes women and minorities suffer the most.
You go go listen to the Joe Rogan / Sanjay Gupta interview. Joe was prescribed it by his doctor, a human medication for a human. Regardless of the efficacy of ivermectin, the fact that CNN continued in their attempts to smear him shows just how untrustworthy the media is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
A drug for a specific, narrow purpose. That purpose being completely unrelated to Covid. The fact you're still defending this speaks volumes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
Bear in mind that he is a horse's ass, perhaps not surprising that he has strong feelings about horse medicine
Do you think Lewk honestly believes that Rogan is an average joe? Or do you think he purposely ignores that he is one of the media elite that he rails against and can buy pretty much any prescription that he wishes? Assuming of course its all legit, seeing how this is based off of an instagram short where he peddled half a dozen debunked kitchen sink "treatments". Those self made controversies seem to be his only content, being the dollar store version of Stern that he is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Do you guys realize that Lewk is trying to distract you, and it's working? Focus on the terrible thing that just happened: we found out about peoples rights being taken away too early, and it spoiled the surprise. Just took all the fun right out of it. The leaker needs to fry.
Find his bookie :oQuote:
Originally Posted by Wraith
Texas now plans to challenge Plyler V Doe, based solely on what was leaked with this abortion opinion.
Plyler V Doe is what guarantees public education.
It's genuinely remarkable how fucking grotesque these halfwits are. It takes a lot of sustained, coordinated community effort to create people who are this grotesquely stupid.
That has to do with illegal immigration. Which is really funny because the whole case and ruling would be utterly unimportant if we just deported anyone here illegally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
How else are you gonna get idiots to sentence pregnant women to death or abuse? You need to make sure the electorate is as stupid as it is savage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
Illegal immigrants aren't part of the electorate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
I was reading on how Alito's draft opinion unexpectedly uses jurisprudence based on substantive due process, something which is normally anathema to his wing of the Court. That explains the emphasis on why this ruling should not be taken to create precedent outside of abortion, they don't want to see substantive due process elsewhere. But they have little reason to use substantive due process here in the first place, it's not necessary to overturn Roe. It or something similar might be required if they want to clear the road for using judicial authority to ban all abortions throughout US jurisdiction via declaring laws permitting abortion to be a violation of the protection against deprivation of life without process of law. All kinds of a stretch and itself bad law but. . . there's really no discernible reason for Alito to be endorsing substantive due process.
Louisiana is now trying to define life as starting at fertilization, not conception. Wants to ban most forms of birth control. Oh, they also want to criminalize miscarriages as a felony murder, which means those women won't get to vote after a conviction.
This isn't about protecting a life, this is about controlling women.
Please stop the trans exclusionary rhetoric!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
Fuck off you stupid cunt
Hey at least they don't let adults marry kids under 16 since 2019, that's progress :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
You're genuinely the dumbest motherfucker I know. How you manage to keep the lights on and put food on the table is just beyond me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
Add Missouri to the dumbduck list with an abortion trigger law. And theirs would also target fertility clinics :rolleyes:
You know this isn't my argument right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...entity/620031/
"Only niche groups tend to care about how Americans discuss gender and pregnancy—including whether it’s better to use the term pregnant people instead of pregnant women. But those groups care a lot. Representative Cori Bush of Missouri used the term birthing people in a hearing, causing a mini-uproar on social media. “When we talk about ‘birthing people,’ we’re being inclusive. It’s that simple,” the pro-abortion-rights group NARAL tweeted in her defense."
The mental gymnastics required to think that this backs up your trolling is impressive in it's own right. :haha:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
So…GOP was looking to steamroll into the Senate and House…now mange to galvanize the Democratic base. This could cost them gains they were looking to make.
Fidiots.
Don't worry, they can always compensate for it by making it more difficult to translate Democratic voters' votes into legislative representation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Veldan Rath