http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/20...h-robbery.html
What are the odds this guy is still alive today if he's black?
Printable View
http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/20...h-robbery.html
What are the odds this guy is still alive today if he's black?
Pretty good actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Being deaf while Asian: https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/am...y-13159009.php
Cops seem to have no self-control:
https://www.propublica.org/article/e...handcuffed-man
Note the inability of the police to police their own.
Isolated 9 incidents.
Don't assault people with bodily fluids and you don't get your face beat. Seems fair.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
Do you care about anything in the Constituin that comes before or after the 2nd amendment?
Spitting is not protected under the 1st amendment. That's assault.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
No it doesn't. The minimum force needed is all that should be used and 2 wrongs don't make a right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
There is a punishment for assault. And a process for procuring that punishment. But you're interested in neither.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
Lewk applauds the psychological and physical abuse of brown children. That's where the bar is set. You're expecting too much from this ludicrous creature.
The options were to forcibly gag the prisoner or use pain compliance to ensure the action stops. I'm sure if he was gagged so he was unable to speak or spit you'd have issues with that too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
WTF is wrong with you, Lewk? Seriously.
No, Lewk, I'm concerned with constitutional rights. You are not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
So let's make you absolute King here. A criminal is spitting on an officer. What should happen?Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Obviously he should receive a dozen blows to the head. According to the law.
He should be arrested.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
Gag him, charge him with assaulting an officer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
Hah I knew it!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
"The spit hoods have been criticised for breaching human rights guidelines and critics call the hoods primitive, cruel and degrading."
Goes to my point that it doesn't even matter what they do, the police will always get attacked by the left.
Right, Lewk. Someone criticizes me. I better take that as a carte blanche to do absolutely whatever I want.
Your point is dumb. The "hoods" cover the entire face and head and their use has been criticised because they have frequently been misused, often on children and the disabled, who can become extremely distressed by having something like that forced onto their heads over the mouth and nostrils. That said, they are nevertheless better than dipshit cops punching a restrained subject in the head a dozen times. I understand that those are the low standards to which we must hold American cops, apparently (as a corps) the biggest bunch of professional dipshits in the western world. It is truly sad that you hold the biggest losers among them in such high regard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
It's hilarious, in an expected and pathetic kind of way, how you can miss the point of something unless someone leads you to it by the nose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewkowski
This is what happens when you have Lewks on the police force.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...ockley/577174/
What a fuck up. The footage does need to be released, I have a hard time understanding how it can 'compromise the investigation.' That said, people turning into an immediate racial issue doesn't help.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimless
Where's the NRA, Lewk? Shouldn't it be concerned about a good guy with a gun being shot for having a gun?
The second amendment only applies to persons and those the NRA views as three-fifths of a person.
Posted in wrong thread originally.
American cops are scum, episode 269338854:
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/...she-gave-birth
WTAF!?