You forgot to mention age and gender, relative to individual or group behavior, are more important than race. :donkey:
You forgot to mention age and gender, relative to individual or group behavior, are more important than race. :donkey:
Only if you ignore every post that said "young black male"...
I bet you neither reside in nor frequent the parts of town that are most responsible for that crime rate. :noob:
Independent of all other factors, hockey players wearing dark colors get penalties at a higher rate than players wearing lighter colors. You have to wonder if dark skinned people in majority white societies get singled out this way in every country. Do blacks in England, for example, get charged with crimes at a higher rate than whites? Does anyone even bother to look at that data anywhere else besides the US?
Using that logic, why are Indian-Americans and Indian-Brits far less likely to get charged with crimes? Why are literal African-Americans (recent immigrants from Africa) succeeding at roughly the same rate as whites?
It can't simply be the skin tone - though it would be interesting to see if very dark African Americans are charged with more crime than the lighter. Around where I live Indians sometimes look Arabic and so are probably disproportionately feared as terrorists. Sometimes? That comes down to dress, I think.
For once, I am in agreement with GGT. :noob: It's an interesting fact that in most major sports, referees are nicer to the home team.
:D Sounds like some kind of anthropological phenomenon inherited from ancestors....when nighttime was pitch black and boogie man scary. Black Hat/White Hat syndrome? Interesting to note that many sports referees wear both black and white, in even and symmetrical stripes.
Not sure what that meant for B & W striped prison garb though. :noob: