Actually it's extremely unawesome and irresponsible. Esp. for a person who can't afford to get fired, even more so for a person on whom others depend.
Printable View
Like taking someone's life for instance? Yeah, I agree that's terrible.
God Bless Ninjas
By the fruits you will know them.
I can't wait for his post in the "What's messing with your groove" thread after the rapture :up:
Being an evil librul european I am not intimidated by your implication that I am somehow a terrorist lover and i reject your assertion that there is a link, even in degree, between a terrorist blowing themselves up before reaching a target and a thief being killed in an alley like a dog for the price of a roll of toothpaste.
And hey, we allow degrees of murder, and we allow degrees of theft. Thats why people keep bringing up the fact that it was "just a roll of toothpaste". Not because that makes it right but because being vigilante-d in the street is much worse.
Really, its only your obvious delight that makes your posts a bit disgusting and frankly make me feel just a little bit dirty for reading them. Kind of like when someone wants to show you videos of hostages being beheaded by the taliban or whatever.
Anyway, youre almost certainly going to hell for your delight in the death and pain of gods most beloved. Shouldnt you be out helping people like that, not crowing online every time one of them is illegally killed?
Har
In some parts of the world, taking a toothpaste-thief's life is murder.
Also, maybe we should give Palestine back to the Palestinians.
And Murika to the Indians
And the earth back to the birds 'n the trees 'n the li'l furry animulz.
And the world back to the void from whence it came
yes, can we do that?
Why don't Christians ever ask God to bless Satan? If God and Satan patched things up, wouldn't everything be better?
Given what a nebulous character Satan represents in the Christian cosmogony (and which version of Christianity are we talking about, anyway?) that question has a plethora of answers
It even depends on the area and the timeframe.
In the Dark Ages, there were a multitude of devils, for example. A friend of mine once did a paper on those - I only remember the "trouser devil", though. :(
I seem to remember being told at school very similar things to choobs - there was no hell, just an eternity away from gods love. No satan, either. Purely figurative.
The impatient devil. And I think in English you mean "demon", not devil. At least that's the term Carl Sagan used in The Demon Haunted World which sounds like what you're talking about.
Right. It's our understanding of god that changes, not god. And we have to assume our current, here and now understanding is the correct one. So my statement stands. Fucker. :mad:
Which of your statements? Roman Catholicism is not the latest and thus most up to date understanding cum revelation of God we have.
Dude. You arn't this dense, right? You're loaded, or playing? Revisit the line of posts. First, like a good scientist, you asked what specific religion were we going to discuss vis a vis Satan. I picked Rome. Then Kenny brought up time, which was a little redundant, IMO, since there's no reason to question we were discussing anything but now. So where is the confusion? Our understanding of god is the correct understanding. How in the world could some moron in the past have got it right if they don't agree with our modern enlightened selves?
Posting to keep up with his postcount
:sour:
Choobs, your first mistake was expecting Nessie to be serious
I'm almost half-serious, his response was inane!