http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kl1ujzRidmU
Youch :o
But as he says on his facebook (among many other fairly sensible things as well as plugs for the Muscular Dystrophy Association) these were 8 minutes of one of the worst days of his life :o
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kl1ujzRidmU
Youch :o
But as he says on his facebook (among many other fairly sensible things as well as plugs for the Muscular Dystrophy Association) these were 8 minutes of one of the worst days of his life :o
That cig never touched his lips, that says all you need to know for how pissed he was.
but I can't stop wondering if the hard drive survived...
When I saw this video, it was the first time I had ever been so happy to see something so expensive get destroyed. As a future teacher, I have to sit and watch and deal with a ridiculous amount of entitled assholes called high school teenagers. There are way too many parents that are not doing their job being a parent and just want to be the kids' friend. It blows my mind and pisses me off to know end. I want to shake that fathers hand and tell him how great of a job he did with that video. I'm sure it killed him to have to make that video because i'm sure he loves his child but I hope he grounds that little bitch until she goes to college.
I doubt sticks without carrots work for bringing up kids. After all, the guy grounded his daughter for 3 months in the past (which seems rather extreme for a teenager). I don't begrudge him for destroying that laptop, but providing one punishment after another isn't going to fix his daughter. He should at least reduce the period of grounding each time she does her chores, does well in school, etc.
chores and school should never be used as rewards in that manner. Such things should be seen as expected. Sure, you can reward the child for performing those items well, even while grounded, but you don't want to fall into the cycle of normal behavior being seen as a way to get out of punishment.
maybe its the wording I used, but I don't consider not getting in trouble, and getting out of trouble, to be the same thing. Grounding your child for skipping class and then lifting that grounding for doing the dishes results in 2 totally different behavioral conditioning outcomes.
EDIT:
How I'm interpreting Loki's post:
Doing the dishes, then skipping school = punishment
Skipping school, then doing dishes = less punishment
Which is why certain things you expect from your children shouldn't ever enter the equation when it comes to punishment and rewards.
And dishing out punishments vastly disproportional to the crime is bound to create resentment.
Kids think every punishment is disproportional.
Sure, but do you really think that the punishment for publicly insulting one's parents should be a significantly lower quality of life for several years? Maybe chop their hands off too?
Well, it's clear she's her father's daughter.
tough love = good
humiliation = bad
he could have easily put his foot down while opening communication channels, without the nationwide humiliation. Although his stunt here did get him a visit by child protective services and some parenting counseling. That is always good.
can we try not to so greatly exaggerate what is presented in the video?
He says no access to most forms of technology until she hits 18.
awww...
Is that your interpretation of this line:
or this line:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
cause he never mentions anything about turning 18Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
:noob:
Dang...OG and I are agreeing on something?
Parenthood has ruined me.
Which is obviously the same as chopping her hands off. Not to mention that she can still get one herself, and said nothing about using the family computer (assuming they have one), just that he's not getting her anything for herself anymore. Hell, he even got her a job interview! This is so similar to chopping her hands off, thank you so much for making that valid comparison. Taking away something as trivial as hands is obviously as bad as not buying your daughter stuff for herself, but making her work for it!
Damn, come to think of it, my parents never gave me a laptop or a digital camera, I'm lucky that I still have my hands to use the keyboard of the laptop I bought.
Honestly I don't think this is good parenting, I just think that some good may have come out of it. It may be good for a teenager to learn that their parents are in fact human beings (with all that entails). Humiliation isn't a good parenting tool in and of itself. These two have had problems for some time and I have no doubt much of it is because of the way the dad is.
:bulb:
he flat out says her next laptop is one she is going to buy.
15 going on 16, so the birthday thing is kind of a wash, but I don't see a problem with some possible responsibility for someone who has reached this level of entitlement.Quote:
He got her a job interview...she's 15.
As OG said, he flat out said her next laptop would be her own. I have listened to the video, have you? Also, I had a job starting at 13 or 14 to pay for my luxuries.
Opinions on whether or not this is good parenting or not, you've said things in this thread that aren't true, and compared it to chopping her hands off. The only reason I am posting at all (after all, I'm not a parent, I can't really judge well) is because your posts are really annoying me. I don't think it's inherently wrong not to give your kids everything they ask for, especially if they are not grateful for it. Or do you think all parents who don't get their kids a laptop or camera are evil? Because in that cvase, there are a lot of evil parents in this world.
I don't think I agree with this, but he did release a detailed account of the aftermath of this video. its a lot more collected and focused.
https://www.facebook.com/tommyjordan...50524399260846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
Motivation is tricky
Have you listened to the video? He said she won't need any computer parts until college at 6:10. Near the end, he says she can buy a new laptop whenever she's not grounded, whichever year that's in. So no, she won't be able to buy a new laptop to replace this one for the foreseeable future.
Yes, I do think that all parents who take away "toys" their children spend most of their time on as punishment, for years to boot, are borderline evil. At the very least, it shows them to be incredibly vindictive and unforgiving. And it certainly doesn't help when we're at an age of technology, when most interaction children have (outside of school) are with those technologies, and even doing their homework becomes much more difficult without them.Quote:
Opinions on whether or not this is good parenting or not, you've said things in this thread that aren't true, and compared it to chopping her hands off. The only reason I am posting at all (after all, I'm not a parent, I can't really judge well) is because your posts are really annoying me. I don't think it's inherently wrong not to give your kids everything they ask for, especially if they are not grateful for it. Or do you think all parents who don't get their kids a laptop or camera are evil? Because in that cvase, there are a lot of evil parents in this world.
A 15-year-old isn't going to get paid more than $5 an hour for a job (if that). Unless you expect them to have absolutely no free time at all, the most they can realistically earn in a week is $50. If you remove even $10 of that for hanging out with friends, it would take the girl more than half a year to save up for a laptop alone. It's one thing when parents can't afford something or when the child hasn't gotten used to using a given "toy". But punishing someone for years at a time for a handful of lapses in judgment is downright cruel. I sincerely hope you wisen up before you have a child of your own if you're going to treat them like scum.
Edit: Reading OG's post, it looks like the father didn't even buy her the laptop. She bought the laptop with gift money that she received. So, in effect, he's destroying her property, bought with her own money. That will surely teach her a proper lesson.
I'm also amused by people who think the purpose of criminal punishment is rehabilitation supporting a punishment for an act like this that is both disproportional and vindictive.
Whoa. This:
is no where near the same as this:
Which was the original complaint against you. Your usual attempt to over-exaggerate simple facts.
The age has already been shown to be a moot point. See: 15 going on 16. I was making well over $5 an hour a decade ago when I was 16. Even if it was $5 an hour, at $50 (or $40) a week. My notebook cost me $200 new. Thats barely over a month of saving.Quote:
A 15-year-old isn't going to get paid more than $5 an hour for a job (if that). Unless you expect them to have absolutely no free time at all, the most they can realistically earn in a week is $50. If you remove even $10 of that for hanging out with friends, it would take the girl more than half a year to save up for a laptop alone. It's one thing when parents can't afford something or when the child hasn't gotten used to using a given "toy". But punishing someone for years at a time for a handful of lapses in judgment is downright cruel. I sincerely hope you wisen up before you have a child of your own if you're going to treat them like scum.
You're doing that thing again. That exaggeration thing.Quote:
Edit: Reading OG's post, it looks like the father didn't even buy her the laptop. She bought the laptop with gift money that she received. So, in effect, he's destroying her property, bought with her own money. That will surely teach her a proper lesson.
The wording is
which doesn't support soley your interpretationQuote:
The second lesson I want her to learn is the value of a dollar. We don’t give her everything she asks for, but you can all imagine what it’s like being the only grandchild and the first child. Presents and money come from all sides when you’re young. Most of the things she has that are “cool” were bought or gifted that way. She’s always asked for very few things, but they’re always high-dollar things (iPod, laptop, smartphone, etc). Eventually she gets given enough money to get them.
You've yet to solidify this claim with knowledge or facts :oQuote:
I'm also amused by people who think the purpose of criminal punishment is rehabilitation supporting a punishment for an act like this that is both disproportional and vindictive.
Was it a gift or wasn't it??
You know, it's weird. I am generally positive about this incident, but I definitely believe the dad went over the line through his disproportionately vindictive acts of humiliation and destruction. As I see it, the question isn't whether or not he (or the kid) was out of line. I'm more interested in reflecting on how to relate to an event such as this, a difficult conflict between father and daughter. That said, I don't think disproportional and vindictive punishments are appropriate between father and daughter :o