Two words for you, Lewk.
Grayson Fritts
Type: Posts; User: LittleFuzzy
Two words for you, Lewk.
Grayson Fritts
I expect they will but since my understanding is that this is about him improperly taking classified material, I suspect it still won't end up being worthwhile
I'd never before experienced a cold/flu that actually made my skin hurt. I'd heard about it, but never had it myself. I wish that was still the case. On the plus-side, still Covid free. This...
It might be, if there was any indication in the slightest that it was even marginally effective. But there is no indication that it would be the slightest bit effective. 100% efficiency of 0 is...
You know, Being, I would have been perfectly happy to go through life without ever having heard about any fetishes Elon Musk might have *shudders*
And I'm proposing sweeping gun seizures that must properly be dealt with the same way, on their individual merits, with no regard for precedent or generally applicable rules or prior rulings.
So every individual act is constitutional until proven guilty at the Supreme level? Excellent. We should start rounding up all the guns right now. Sure, some of them will have to be returned after...
Who do YOU think should be making those decisions for the company, as a private business? The company and its officers? Its shareholders? The fraud who tried to acquire it and is now trying to...
What's the context? Are you writing an article for a medical journal regarding ovarian or testicular cancer? What actual relevance does it have? If the context you're using is socio-cultural, than...
More than a bit contradictory, absolutely. But they were being very carefully selective in drawing on their own past opinions to justify overturning Roe now, picking and choosing from the parts that...
It won't help a whole lot in Congress, but him splitting the party would at least preserve a veto against a GOP legislature, and they're never going to muster the votes to pass something like an...
Not a justiciable controversy before the courts at the time. As I've already said, they won't have their chance to do that until a GOP voted in on the basis of a stagflating economy passes the...
There's only one "fix" that stays within the the current framework, packing the Court, and that's just hospice care because once the Dems do it, the GOP will just pack it further as soon as they're...
It's legalese but I can think of three rationales. Two of them are wrong but might be persuasive to people. The third might actually apply. The first is that since he was the sitting President at...
It is under this Court. How else can states be allowed to prosecute those who break their laws elsewhere, like those on healthcare holidays seeking abortions? It can't matter if a crime occurred...
Note, Flixy, that poll's findings were not of the American public in general but of those who already think he tried to overturn the election. 66% think he tried to overturn it. 2/3 of that 66%...
Staying the matter until the current justiciable controversy has passed is a decision. It doesn't create precedent but haven't you been harping that precedent is meaningless anyway?
In fairness, there would be a point to that. Forcing SCOTUS to strike it down will make it harder for SCOTUS to approve when a Republican Congress passes the law outlawing it. But they can't do it...
But neither of those are crimes against property and that's the only thing that matters to Lewk. Everything else is ephemeral but property lasts.
If you're not actively pushing your ethics than it doesn't much matter either way (except again, wrt raising kids). Your only impact, ethically, is from passive streams like what your taxes support....
At the broadest ethical level, it is probably more responsible to move and "prosyletize" your ethics. And at the the deepest, strongest ethical level, it's doing whatever is best for the children...
No they won't. We all see where the economy is going and know what that means regarding party switches in Congress and the Oval Office. Which means we're going to get that federal ban McConnell...
Not so. Only if it advances that religion. Religious education includes instruction in that religion and time practicing that faith. I've attended a christian school, thank you. It included time...
It's a state's right to decide. Until a GOP-controlled federal government passes a national ban at which point it's not a state's right to decide at all. If it involves abortion. Of course neither...
Whether a man is shot and killed in a robbery or by the police responding to the robbery is also a distinction without a difference. The government giving the cop a uniform is not in practice any...