Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: Decision Time Looms for Wheat Farmers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Decision Time Looms for Wheat Farmers

    Worth watching where this goes...

    BUSINESS AUGUST 9, 2010
    Decision Time Looms for Wheat Farmers
    By LIAM PLEVEN, NOUR MALAS And PATRICK BARTA

    Wheat farmers in the U.S. and elsewhere are gearing up to make a crucial bet on the health of the world's grain supplies.

    Many farmers must decide within the next few weeks whether to plant more wheat to take advantage of rising prices triggered by the crippling drought in Russia and the nation's export ban.

    At the same time, Russian farmers are facing a rapidly closing window. The fate of their 2011 crop rests on whether rain finally falls in time for new plantings to take hold.

    The weather and decisions made by farmers throughout the world will have ramifications for the price of wheat and many other commodities. Worries about a shortage already have sent grain prices soaring, threatening a potentially damaging bout of food inflation. But if waves of farmers decide to plant added wheat to take advantage of that threat—and if next year's Russian crop is strong—the balance could quickly tip to a glut, driving prices down and hurting rural economies.

    On Monday, an Australian commission warned that a hatching of a huge locust plague with the potential to devastate winter crops, including wheat, in eastern Australia could start as early as next week. Australia usually is a major global supplier of wheat and barley.

    Egypt, the world's top importer, said over the weekend that the recent rise in prices could cost it an additional four billion Egyptian pounds, or about $705 million. Cairo also moved to secure other supplies after Russia imposed an export ban, buying 240,000 tons from France on Saturday.

    Indonesia, Thailand and other nations already face higher costs for various food items, including sugar and pork, heightening concerns about a return of the civil unrest that accompanied rising food costs in 2008.

    Egypt, the world's top importer, said over the weekend that the recent rise in prices could cost it an additional four billion Egyptian pounds, or about $705 million. Cairo also moved to secure other supplies after Russia imposed an export ban, buying 240,000 tons from France on Saturday.

    Indonesia, Thailand and other nations already face higher costs for various food items, including sugar and pork, heightening concerns about a return of the civil unrest that accompanied rising food costs in 2008.


    Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov has said the government may revise the ban—currently set to run from Aug. 15 until Dec. 31—later this year, depending on the harvest. Meanwhile, the influential grain union is pressing the government to delay the start of the ban until Sept. 1.

    And D.P. Singh, president of the All India Grains Exporters Association, estimates that India has around 47 million to 50 million tons of wheat in storage across the country. Mr. Singh sees a good chance that the government will open up to wheat exports in the near future, taking advantage of its stocks and a likely increase in wheat prices.

    The high stakes in coming weeks show how thin the margin for error is in the global food supply. The appetites of many nations are growing, and they rely on international trade to sate it.

    The world got a taste of the consequences with the 2008 food riots, and many governments took steps to increase stockpiles and increase production as a result. The current wheat-market seizure could mark the start of a major test of those fixes.

    Russia is facing discontent over its handling of the disaster, and in Malaysia and Thailand there already are rumblings over food prices.

    In Thailand, many consumers have been complaining about an unexpected jump in the price of sugar after the country ran low on supplies and had to import the commodity for the first time in 30 years.

    "Prices of food are higher in every category" since the beginning of this year, says Porntip Uthaichan, a 30-year-old coffee vendor in Bangkok. The cost of sugar, which she uses in the coffee she sells, has shot up about 45% to roughly 29 Thai baht (91 U.S. cents) a kilogram this year, she says, while the pork she buys is about 20% more expensive than earlier this year.

    Also, the Muslim holy month of Ramadan is set to begin this week, a time of daily fasting and feasting when families increase their normal food purchases by upward of 25%. That could increase pressure on governments to check price increases. The oil-rich Gulf countries import an estimated 85% to 90% of all basic food goods, according to a recent report by the Arab Organization for Agricultural Development.

    The world's farmers must choose with incomplete information about forces that could drive future price swings. Wheat stocks are high, but it isn't clear if key nations will share the bounty. Moreover, if Russia's drought eases by fall, it could produce a strong crop next year, which could turn fears of a shortage into a sudden glut.

    "A titanic 2011 U.S. acreage battle is brewing," said Rich Feltes, senior vice president for research at MF Global, a commodities brokerage firm.

    In recent years, a move toward ethanol has boosted demand for corn.

    U.S. farmers have pulled back from wheat, and the size of the crop shrank 11% in the past two years, to 2.2 billion bushels, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

    The number of harvested acres world-wide has also stagnated and was forecast to decline in the coming crop.

    Futures prices fell sharply in the financial crisis, from nearly $13 a bushel in early 2008 to around $4.50 a bushel less than 10 months later. In early June, they were trading around $4.28 due to an apparent glut. Prices surged above $7 last week.

    On Wednesday, when wheat rose 7%, Mr. Millershaski in Kansas was taking a break from field work to refill the machine that he uses to spread fertilizer, when his father-in-law brought up the idea of planting more wheat than usual this fall.

    "We're doing the math," he said.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...972922474.html

  2. #2
    Russia has already banned wheat exports, so that should tip the scales in favor of planting more. The already existing dought, and the fact that so much of the country is/was in flames. I'm not expecting anything to change on their end that would fix the expected crisis.

    Please don't take away my $5 pizza

  3. #3
    Senior Member Flixy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    6,435
    The most ridiculous part is that in India (where there are still a lot of people starving), 18 million tonnes of wheat is rotting away. For some reason they didn't want to export it, but they also didn't want to sell it, subsidized, to their own people, because that would cost too much money. So now it's rotting away (which seems more costly than selling it for a too low price to me).
    Keep on keepin' the beat alive!

  4. #4
    Florida farmers did that with their strawberries last season. They let the fields rot, because prices were so low it would have cost more to operate the machines (or pay workers) than what they would have sold for. It happens every decade or so; used to be great for the schools, cause thats when the farmers open their fields in a free for all fieldtrip.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Flixy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    6,435
    This wheat was already off the farms, and in storage. But the storage is filled to its capacity, so it's stored outdoors, and when the monsoon comes it will rot.
    Keep on keepin' the beat alive!

  6. #6
    Just Floatin... termite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Land of Milk & Honey
    Posts
    1,213


    Make wheat while the sun shines....so to speak.

    http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...cument&src=rss

    THE DAILY CHART: Wheat cravings

    Alex Liddington-Cox
    Published 10:33 AM, 6 Aug 2010

    Russia's temporary ban on wheat exports due to the crippling drought that has fed supply concerns for the last two months pushed wheat prices up another 8 per cent overnight. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced that grain and flour exports from the world's third largest wheat producer will be banned from August 15 to December 31, with a spokesperson later saying that this would apply to contracts that have already been signed. Wheat prices are now up 82 per cent in less than three months.

    While no Australian farmer will cheer the immense pain being felt by their Russian comrades, Russia's drought has brought relief – at least to some of them. Australian farmers who could afford to ride out the price slump of between late 2009 and early 2010, and store their crops can now take advantage of the price surge. But most don't have that luxury and will be hoping that this speculative frenzy has a lasting effect on prices, at least until Russia's ban is lifted at the end of December.
    Australian farmers begin harvesting their crops in November.
    I spoke to a farmer last month and he was relieved to have locked in a contracted price of $3.60, just a few weeks later and he could have contracted almost double that amount. If his crop fails (quite possible given the weather conditions and the threat of locusts) he will be required to buy wheat in order to fulfil his contract - he may have to pay $7-$8 for wheat he is required to self for $3.60.

    Farming, more than ever is big-ticket gambling.
    Such is Life...

  7. #7
    The USDA report was mostly neutral for wheat, said John Kleist, a broker and analyst at Allendale Commodities Research and Trading Co. in McHenry, Ill.

    "Traders are very hopeful we are going to have extra demand (for wheat) at these ever higher prices," he said.

    Kleist himself is not so sure. The U.S. is sitting on pretty comfortable wheat reserves, at their highest in two decades. Current prices, he said, are a result of "unbridled optimism, and I mean it a bit sarcastically."
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/whe...dist=afterbell


    Remind me again why they exclude the price of food when calculating inflation rates?

  8. #8
    Food and energy are excluded because it's very volatile. Which is possibly stupid because food and energy is vital.

    It certainly feels like we may run into something like the summer of 2008 when food prices skyrocketed.

  9. #9
    But oil was expensive in '08, so the wheat had to eat high transportation costs. Many wheat farmers had switched to corn, for the biofuel profit.

    This time around our oil is hanging pretty low, our (US) wheat stores are at an all time high, but it's global demand that's unknown. Plus the next planting season that has yet to come.

    I read other investment "advice" that tells people to get into edible commodities, which is speculating on (and hoping for) poorer nations with hungry people. Not just farmers or producers hedging to protect their product income or price stability, but to profit on potential misery and desperation.

    It does seem stupid to peg inflation without including food and energy prices. Was hoping some econ geek would come along to explain why it's still done that way.....

  10. #10
    Most poor people in the developing world grow their own food, so aren't really affected by global food prices. The poorest ones tend to get it for free from international organizations/NGOs. The only people from those countries who are affected are the people who live in urban areas, and they're a minority.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  11. #11
    How does that explain the way US economists calculate inflation?

  12. #12
    Economists report core inflation (what you're referring to) and the actual inflation rate...
    Hope is the denial of reality

  13. #13
    Core inflation includes currency variations and monetary policies, right? Am I wrong to think actual inflation is what matters to most people, so it should definitely include food and energy prices?

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    Core inflation includes currency variations and monetary policies, right? Am I wrong to think actual inflation is what matters to most people, so it should definitely include food and energy prices?
    There's a general Consumer Price Index, which includes food and energy prices. Then there's the core inflation rate, which excludes food and energy. Economists don't make judgments about which are more important for people.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  15. #15
    They calculate everything. There are inflation rates for every sector of the economy. The point of looking at core inflation is that you ignore rapid swings that makes it difficult to understand the condition of the economy.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    They calculate everything. There are inflation rates for every sector of the economy. The point of looking at core inflation is that you ignore rapid swings that makes it difficult to understand the condition of the economy.
    If they calculate everything, they should calculate how much time and energy they waste calculating everything.

    Also, if economists had a good handle on the condition of the real economy, they wouldn't end up sounding so frequently wrong, clueless, or late to the game. There's probably a joke about that......and it might be funny if it weren't for the fact that our illustrious leaders rely on illustrious economists.

  17. #17
    In that case, why the hell are economists calculating core inflation rate at all? Who does that benefit, and what does it tell them.....economists must be making a judgement that it's important enough to track.....?

    Could this be one reason why academic economists often sound like they're busy running numbers and carrying loads of information to government officials, who then seem out of touch with "regular people" who gauge inflation by how far their wages go to buy food and fuel?

  18. #18
    I wonder if the reason they're "wrong" all the time is because no one bothers to report when they're not.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I wonder if the reason they're "wrong" all the time is because no one bothers to report when they're not.
    Kinda like meteorologists, huh.

    Come to think of it, could following high-tech satellite and doppler global weather patterns tell us more about the future supply/demand/price of wheat than an economist?

  20. #20
    Just one smartassicle answer to this question!

    Welcome to the wonderful, stable, world of farming!
    I don't have a problem with authority....I just don't like being told what to do!Remember, the toes you step on today may be attached to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow!RIP Fluffy! 01-07-09 I'm so sorry Fluffster! People who don't like cats were probably mice in an earlier life! My mind not only wanders, sometimes it leaves completely!The nice part about living in a small town: When you don't know what you're doing, someone else always does!
    Atari bullshit refugee!!

  21. #21
    But futures trading was supposed to make farming more stable. Not more volatile with wild swings up and down, or driving farmers nuts with regret.

    But that was before any investor could enter commodities futures markets, grain exchanges, index funds, hedge funds, and high frequency trading. Now, the farmer and the manufacturer has to compete with other forces, that don't really care about food as FOOD.

    How's it working?

  22. #22
    The agriculture industry, by the very nature that Mother Nature is really in charge, will never be stable!
    I don't have a problem with authority....I just don't like being told what to do!Remember, the toes you step on today may be attached to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow!RIP Fluffy! 01-07-09 I'm so sorry Fluffster! People who don't like cats were probably mice in an earlier life! My mind not only wanders, sometimes it leaves completely!The nice part about living in a small town: When you don't know what you're doing, someone else always does!
    Atari bullshit refugee!!

  23. #23
    Q: Why would Russia have an export ban on a crop that is supposedly going to be relatively more expensive than the very same crop in other countries? Does that make any sense? Sounds like someone's just on a power binge, or possibly a way to get back at enemies who own non-Russian bakeries, with Russian wheat as the only supplier?


    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Most poor people in the developing world grow their own food, so aren't really affected by global food prices.
    Lulz, you wish! That used to be true.... maybe 100 years ago? Most developing countries (by population) have massive urban slums that depend on aid or food from the countryside...

  24. #24
    A: To keep the wheat for their own citizens. Presumably to avoid shortages, bread lines, or angry hungry mobs with pitchforks. Sure, they could make money selling it at highest market rate, only to turn around and import more at that higher rate?

    Speaking of commodity trading, I read this just now. So yeah, never say never, or that traders can't manipulate things.

    Trading Group Fined for Driving Up Oil Price

    Published: Tuesday, 17 Aug 2010
    By: Gregory Meyer, Financial Times

    The U.S. futures regulator on Monday fined a commodity trading group $12 million for pushing crude oil to $100-a-barrel for the first time in 2008.

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission said a trader at a former unit of ConAgra Foods, bent on driving oil to triple-digit levels, caused a “non-bona fide price” to be reported for the benchmark US crude futures contract. Gavilon, the commodity trading house, later bought the unit’s trading operations.

    The fine, which was agreed by the CFTC and the current owners of the trading unit, comes more than two years after crude oil futures surged to a record $147 a barrel, prompting a CFTC investigation.

    The settlement sheds light on one of the more mystifying moments in oil’s price rally.

    On the first day of trading in 2008, a single contract for $100 oil changed hands on the floor of the New York Mercantile Exchange even as the electronic market was trading at a substantial discount.
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38734171

    Piddly fine, for all the profits made on the backs of the consumer. When oil shot up like that, it was like the straw that broke the camel's back for recession austerity. gah

  25. #25
    Do you even understand what the fine was for and what went wrong? Because I don't, and it seems pretty inconsequential if it took two years for a regulator to fine one guy for one trade in January 2008 (way before the summer of 2008, when oil prices really skyrocketed).

  26. #26
    Trying to manipulate commodity prices, it seems.

    The article wasn't very clear, but it was "one guy" doing something "his company" initiated on purpose. No way now to untangle all the trades made during that time, or how HFT may have reacted.

    I'm not well versed on how CFTC deems bona fide or non-bona fide prices.

  27. #27
    AUGUST 18, 2010

    A $39 Billion Food Fight

    By ANUPREETA DAS, SCOTT KILMAN And LIAM PLEVEN

    Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP Billiton made an unsolicited $38.6 billion offer for the world's largest fertilizer producer, Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc., in an aggressive wager that developing economies will drive up demand for the world's food supply.

    Potash is an important nutrient that replenishes soil and increases farmland's crop yield. Global potash supplies are relatively limited, and Potash Corp., based in the prairies of central Canada, controls approximately 20% of the supply.

    The offer is likely to set off a long struggle for the fate of the Canadian company, a crown jewel of the country's natural-resources-based economy.

    Potash's board rejected the BHP offer of $130 a share in cash, a 16% premium to Potash's Monday closing price, calling it "grossly inadequate."

    In trading Tuesday, the fertilizer company's shares soared far above the offer, a sign traders expect BHP to raise its bid or other suitors to emerge. Potash shares closed at $143.17, up $31.02, or 27.7%.

    The company's chief executive, Bill Doyle, said the board wasn't opposed to a sale, "we just don't expect someone to come steal the company."

    People familiar with the matter said BHP would decide in the next few days whether to take its offer directly to Potash shareholders, a move that would officially make BHP's unsolicited offer a hostile one.

    Potash adopted a shareholder-rights plan on Tuesday that puts a 20% ceiling on any single stakeholder.

    Such a "poison pill" may be less effective in Canada than in the U.S. because a hostile bidder can lobby Canadian securities regulators to have the target company eliminate its plan and allow a tender offer to shareholders.

    BHP's shares closed Tuesday at $70.21, down $1.73, or 2.4%, in trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Wednesday morning in Australia, shares fell 3.7%.

    Analysts speculated that mining rivals Vale SA of Brazil, and the Anglo-Australian company Rio Tinto PLC could consider counteroffers. Vale, which not long ago made a $3.8 billion purchase of fertilizer assets, declined to comment. Rio Tinto didn't immediately return a call.

    Mr. Doyle of Potash declined to say what might be a suitable offer. People close to the company, based in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, said an offer would need to factor in Potash's record high of nearly $240 in mid-2008. The offer from BHP was made in a letter Aug. 12 that Potash disclosed on Tuesday.

    Looming over any merger negotiations is a national debate in Canada about open markets and foreign takeovers.

    Over the past decade, the country has seen most of its big natural-resources companies and many industrial ones taken over by buyers from the U.S., Europe and South America.

    The deals included the sales of aluminum and nickel mines to Brazil's Vale and Switzerland's Xtrata, the purchase of Canada's biggest steel producer by U.S. Steel Corp., and the piecemeal sale of struggling tech giant Nortel Networks Corp. to buyers from the U.S. and Europe.

    While demand for commodities has fueled Canada's economic growth, there is lingering worry among some that the country is losing its corporate mettle.

    In 2009, Canada amended its foreign-takeover code, raising the size of deals that require scrutiny but allowing the government explicit power to veto deals thought to pose a danger to national security.

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the government would review any transaction but otherwise declined to comment.

    As the world's largest mining company, BHP has remained unbowed by a costly and ultimately unsuccessful attempt in 2008 to take over Rio Tinto, its big Anglo-Australian rival.

    For BHP's chief executive, South African Marius Kloppers, a play for Potash fits into a broader theme of economic development, particularly in China and India.

    "World GDP and GDP development is being driven by...new people entering the modern industrial age...by massive urbanization processes," Mr. Kloppers said in an interview in 2008. This, he said, is "having a huge knock-on effect in demand for our products."

    A deal for Potash would represent a shift for BHP, which specializes in minerals and metals and has limited experience with customers who buy fertilizer. Potash is the common name for fertilizer derived from potassium, and includes potassium carbonate and other salts. It is one of the common fertilizers farmers use, along with nitrogen and phosphate.

    There are plenty of reasons to expect rising demand for fertilizer. The world is projected to add an average of 57 million people a year between 2000 and 2050, leading to a population of 8.9 billion in 2050, according to United Nations projections. Rising incomes in growing economies will also push up demand for diverse diets, and fertilizer is a sure way to increase food production.

    Such long-term global trends have turned Potash Corp. into a highflying stock that has soared since 2005.

    BHP is also counting on China and other rapidly growing nations placing a premium on producing more food, to be independent from foreign suppliers.

    Meeting such a basic need is critical, as vividly demonstrated in 2008, when a sharp rise in the cost of food kicked off riots in some parts of the world. This summer's scare over wheat supplies amid a Russian drought provided another reminder.

    "It's just a bet that food is going to continue to be precious, and become more precious," said Emerson Nafziger, a professor of agronomy at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "It's a bet that the whole world is going to need to replace nutrients in the soil as crops are removed."

    China produces only about roughly half as much corn as the U.S. on a given amount of farmland. U.S. farmers generate more than 10 metric tons per hectare (2.47 acres), while China produces just over five and India just over two.

    While there are various reasons for such gaps in production, including water and use of genetically modified seeds, fertilizer use is one of the factors.

    USDA forecasts released last week show the world will likely consume more grain through next year than farmers are able to produce, which will inevitably shrink the globe's grain reserves again.

    World fertilizer demand fell 7% in 2008-09, then rebounded 3.7% in 2009-10 to 162.5 million metric tons, according to the International Fertilizer Industry Association.

    It has forecast that demand will rise 4.8% in 2010-2011 and then reach 188.3 million metric tons in 2014-15, amounting to average annual growth 2.5%.

    If prices for agricultural commodities rise in years ahead, farmers will have incentives to buy more fertilizer to boost yields, noted Don Roose, president of U.S. Commodities Inc. in West Des Moines, Iowa.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...386821512.html

  28. #28
    COMMODITIES | AUGUST 25, 2010
    What's the Beef? Food-Inflation Fears

    By LIAM PLEVEN

    Cattle prices are soaring toward records, pushing up the cost of beef in grocery stores and adding to the risk of a broader wave of food inflation.

    The gains are being fueled by rising appetites globally and a dwindling U.S. herd. Purchases of U.S. beef around the world have surged as emerging economies become more prosperous. At the same time, ranchers hit in recent years by drought and the financial crisis have cut the number of cattle to the lowest level in decades.

    The rally has driven up the futures market for cattle by 11% since early July to reach the brink of the $1-a-pound mark, just shy of the $1.04 record set in 2008. Prices dipped 0.3% Tuesday, to settle at 99.475 cents a pound, after rising for the previous 11 trading sessions.

    Consumers already are paying more, with the retail price of choice beef up 4% in July from December, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. Further increases may be in the offing; last week alone wholesale prices climbed 3.2%.

    While some observers said the August rally may be short-lived, they also said the fundamentals of a cattle shortage and rising demand mean prices will remain high over the longer term.

    Nations in Asia and elsewhere are buying more U.S. beef. Meantime, it will take at least two or three years to substantially increase the U.S. herd, taking into account the months of gestation and then calf growth. The U.S. is crucial because it is the biggest beef producer in the world.

    "You just can't turn this thing around very quickly," said Ron Plain, professor of agricultural economics at the University of Missouri. Absent another economic slowdown, the trends are "going to mean high grocery-store prices for the foreseeable future," he said.

    Higher prices for cattle and beef come as the world is contending with a rise in the cost of wheat and corn this summer, underscoring the threat of price increases like those that triggered riots in a number of poorer nations two years ago. Coffee and sugar also are trading near historical highs. The world's stockpiles are much higher than two years ago, and prices far lower, but many worry the situation will worsen.

    "I do think that we're going to see some serious food inflation," said Mark Engler, director of risk management at Cactus Feeders Inc. in Amarillo, Texas, which runs 10 feedlots and sends one million cattle to slaughter annually.

    Companies and governments are scrambling to satisfy the demand. BHP Billiton, the Anglo-Australian mining company, recently bid $38.6 billion for the world's largest fertilizer producer, Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc., and some Asian governments and sovereign-wealth funds are considering whether to join competing offers.

    The rising cost of a range of agricultural commodities also points to the pressure on restaurants and packaged-food companies, which may be forced to eat the higher costs or charge customers more.

    Beef represents a significant part of the input cost for food makers such as H.J. Heinz Co. and Campbell Soup Co., according to a recent report by Barclays Capital. Both firms are due to report quarterly earnings next week.

    Food manufacturers historically have avoided passing on increases in commodities prices to consumers in order to preserve "brand loyalty," the Grocery Manufacturers Association, a trade group, said in a statement.


    But if commodities prices remain high for an extended period, "consumers will eventually see the impact," the group said.

    The surge in exports has put the U.S. on track to ship more than two billion pounds of beef and veal overseas for the first time since a 2003 outbreak of mad-cow disease, known formally as bovine spongiform encephalopathy.

    Foreign purchases are helping compensate for a steady decline in U.S. consumption, which fell from a peak of 94.3 pounds per capita in 1976 to a projected 59.1 pounds this year, according to the USDA.

    The U.S. herd, meanwhile, has been shrinking for years. In July, the department said there were 100.8 million cattle and calves in the U.S., the lowest since it began measuring in 1973.

    Ranchers cut back after getting hit by drought starting in 2006, then suffered in 2008 when rising grain prices early in the year cut into revenue from feedlots, said Rich Nelson, director of research at Allendale Inc., a brokerage in McHenry, Ill.

    Then the financial crisis slammed U.S. consumers.

    Many ranchers are wary of investing in expanding their herds, even with exports rising and prices climbing, because "they're uncertain about the future," said Gregg Doud, chief economist at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, which represents ranchers and feedlots.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...189073788.html
    [/quote]

  29. #29
    U.S. Farmers Wary of Gaining From Russia’s Woes

    By KIRK JOHNSON
    Published: August 19, 2010



    SPRINGFIELD, Colo. — Russia’s ban on grain exports, in response to a devastating drought, has sent prices shooting up all over the world. But farmers here in wheat country, far from seeing the spike as an unexpected blessing, are wary.

    As planting time approaches next month, they are balancing the possibility of greater income against the failed promises of the past, when bonanzas turned bust, sometimes at terrible cost. Even many who plan to plant more wheat are begrudging and hesitant — fearful that global dynamics could shift again before next year’s harvest.

    Prices hit a two-year high recently, up 57 percent in less than three months. And on Thursday, the price of wheat spiked again after mellowing in the last weeks on reports that Russia may have to import millions of tons of wheat.

    “The market says plant more,” said Eugene Schroder, who farms about 4,000 acres here in the flatlands of southeast Colorado near the Oklahoma border, where agriculture’s fingerprint stretches beyond the eye’s ability to see — some fields stubbled and cleared in post-harvest, others tasseled and green with corn.

    Mr. Schroder said he feared that wheat prices were being driven by speculators, as was the case a few years ago, just before the recession, when the price soared and then crashed.

    “What is this wheat market? I don’t have a clue, and I’m a professional wheat farmer,” he said. “There’s a complete lack of transparency.”

    And yet, if good wet weather holds up in the next few weeks, he plans to follow the market’s signal and quadruple the number of acres in wheat. Mr. Schroder’s nephew, Curtis Schroder, who farms about 10,000 acres, said he was contemplating about the same degree of expansion on his land — to 640 acres, from 160 acres in this most recent crop.

    Planting plans are always closely held, and difficult to decipher. Nonetheless, even talk like that, repeated over morning coffee by men in baseball caps and coveralls, sends a shiver down the spine of people like A. C. Chenoweth.

    Mr. Chenoweth, 89, vividly remembers how the grasslands here in Baca County were broken up for wheat beginning in the 1920s when he was a farm boy. By the mid-’30s, the loosened earth — parched by drought and abandoned by impoverished homesteaders — was lifted up in vast, swirling brown clouds. Southeast Colorado became one of the Dust Bowl’s epicenters.

    “Especially to an old codger like me that saw it first hand, you wonder if it might happen again,” he said. “It worries you.”

    Even before Russia’s drought, wheat was on the rise in Baca County.

    Thousands of acres of grassland formerly protected under a federal system called the Conservation Reserve Program were shifted into open-market farming uses in the last few years — and much of that went to wheat.

    From 2008 to 2009 alone, about 100,000 new acres of winter wheat went into cultivation in the county, according to federal figures — the biggest one-year jump since the late 1950s.

    This year, a quirk of crop insurance, which locks in grain prices for policies based on a window that was set in the last few weeks — after Russia announced the ban on grain exports on Aug. 5 — could accelerate the trend, farm experts said, or prompt farmers in other parts of the country to give wheat another look.

    “I can plant this wheat and be guaranteed a pretty sweet income,” said Bill Spiegel, a spokesman for the Kansas Association of Wheat Growers, referring to the insurance window. “That’s something a savvy farmer has to consider.”

    But there are also reasons why another wheat boom — let alone another Dust Bowl — is not in the offing.

    One is that wheat, the historic amber-waved grain of the American breadbasket, is out of fashion — a beleaguered has-been crop on many farms, supplanted by the modern cash-cow of farming: corn, used for everything from ethanol fuel to food additives to animal feed.

    Fewer acres of wheat were planted nationally last year than any year since 1971, according to federal figures. Kansas, the biggest wheat-producing state, had fewer acres in cultivation this year than any since 1957.

    Another brake on any irrational exuberance over wheat will be farmers’ own suspicions, despite the incentives of higher prices.

    Some think they are being played, and that the big run-up is partly, or largely, just market manipulation — like the increase in 2007 and 2008 that drove wheat prices more than twice as high as they are now before a gut-wrenching crash during the global recession.

    “I hate to sound negative, but I’ve been burned so many dang times on wheat that I think I’m done,” said Olea McCall, who farms about 4,000 acres near the Kansas border, mostly in corn, wheat and sorghum. Mr. McCall said his attitude was not helped by missing out on the new rise in prices.

    “I sold at 4, and three weeks later went to 6,” he said, referring to the price in dollars per bushel.

    He said he thought the climate was changing, too — hotter in summer and colder in spring — making the high plains less favorable to wheat. He has been steadily reducing wheat acres and plans to keep going in that direction.

    And there is another echo of the past that matters to farmers old enough to remember. In 1972 and 1973, in the spirit of thawed tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, the United States sold hundreds of millions of bushels of wheat to the Soviets after another disastrous crop failure there.

    This month’s price spike is eerily similar to what happened then, said Colorado’s agriculture commissioner, John R. Stulp, who is also a wheat farmer. And the response could well be same, too — overreaction and overproduction, leading to a glut and a crash in prices.

    “It took 20 years to sort the market out after that,” Mr. Stulp said of the 1972-73 price bubble.

    But there is also a big division between farmers who sold just before the recent price increase, like Mr. McCall, and those lucky enough, or cagey enough, to have held on — keeping their grain in storage, and their powder dry.

    Mr. Chenoweth, for example, who farms about 3,200 acres — mostly in wheat, with no plans to expand — said he was still sitting tight on his grain stocks, waiting for the higher prices he believes will come.

    “You’ve got to know when to hold your cards,” he said.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/us...farmers&st=cse

  30. #30
    I heard a blip on NPR about rising food prices, comparing the unfolding Russia / Pakistan catastrophes to what happened back in '08 (was that 08?) and the knowledgable individuals said the difference between then and now is that now there is no grain shortage. Back then there was a global shortage of grain that cause the price spike and the resulting riots and such. Today, regardless of wheat losses in Russia, there's a comfortable surplus.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •