http://abcnews.go.com/US/watch-arizo...ry?id=30319373
"Michael Rapiejko, the officer involved, was cleared by county attorneys and returned to work after a few days, Rozema said."
Good news.![]()
http://abcnews.go.com/US/watch-arizo...ry?id=30319373
"Michael Rapiejko, the officer involved, was cleared by county attorneys and returned to work after a few days, Rozema said."
Good news.![]()
Seems more like Grand Theft Auto than real life.
Definitely seems like a brave and sensible act by the Officer involved according to the story detailed by the link. Plus the good news is that the criminal survived to face trial and so the Officer doesn't have to carry around the knowledge he'd killed the man. With a rampaging gunman there's a high chance it'd end in gunfire with cops or innocent bystanders wounded or killed in the crossfire (and the criminal dying "suicide by cop"). No lives were lost that day, so great police work.
I guess we agree on the actions taken though if the criminal would have died it would have been better for everyone. I don't actually see a huge problem with 'knowledge he killed a man.' Different people have different morals of course but when it comes to ending an active threat there should be no guilt.
Nope but looking at it rationally why would someone be upset about killing someone who was a clear and present threat? I can't speak for all moral systems but lets take a look at two common ones.
1. Christianity - once you are saved by Jesus your sins are washed away. Meaning that you shouldn't feel guilt over them. I'm not even suggesting it would be a sin to act the way the officer did but even if it was once forgiveness has been granted the guilt should go away.
2. A more Agnostic approach could be considered 'Greatest Good for the Greatest Number of People.' Clearly stopping an armed person on a rampage meets this test. Rationally speaking if the actions were appropriate why would you waste time on negative emotions such as guilt?
Since your not at theist I'm sure you believe that there is no metaphysical reason to consider killing bad - it all comes down to culture. And in that case what culture thinks putting down a rabid animal is bad or something worth feeling guilty over? Oh I'm sure liberals will bleat about the criminals and 'what a good boy he was' but in reality the vast majority of the culture would be absolutely OK with killing a dangerous threat that was on a rampage. Just like pretty much everyone was OK with killing Osama. Do you think the shooters there should have felt guilty?
It's not something Police Academies are likely to use in their technical training. If the police car is seen as the most effective "weapon", there'd less need to arm police with guns or tasers.
I dunno, I die a little inside every time I read one of his posts and I've always believed that whenever Lewk laughs a fairy loses its wings.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
I'm saying shooters do feel guilty.
Most people are not robots. Yes shooting someone on a rampage is the right thing to do. Doesn't make it easy though. It's easy for you to be a keyboard warrior having never done it but I respect a number of serving officers who've said it's a terribly distressing thing they have to live with. Even if it's right.
Doesn't make much sense to me on a rational level. If it was right why would there be issues with it? Two possibilities exist. People around them are *telling* the person either actively or just in the way they talk about it that they should feel guilty. In fact you're probably part of the problem!
Secondly it might be more of a PTSD thing because in those situations THEY might have died if it had gone otherwise and that can be stressful.
Third option is most humans simply don't want to have to end another human's life and they feel bad about it. Until you've actually done it yourself, I think I'll trust the countless cops and soldiers who've said its a horrible experience over you.
Luckily this cop doesn't have to go through that trauma.
He's talking about on an emotional level. People experience emotions, especially after traumatic events, which know are not rational but which they nevertheless feel anyway.
The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun
There are biological reasons for emotion that are impacted by the culture a person is raised in. There are PLENTY of examples of people having absolutely no remorse when they kill. Ranging anywhere from children to adults, self defense to brutal murders. The liberal idea that everyone should 'feel bad' because they end a life is stupid and is part of their push to coddle criminals.
The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun
Lewk, you're stupid, and people aren't robots (or psychopaths, usually). Even if it was the right thing to do, killing someone is often pretty heavy, emotionally and psychologically. May not be rational bit guess what, people aren't rational in how they feel.
Btw to be fair I haven't killed anyone either.
Keep on keepin' the beat alive!
Jesus himself would have partied all night after killing someone but that's just how he rolled
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."