Originally Posted by
Aimless
Yes, but to summarise his position on marriage, he is perfectly fine with letting state governments meddle all they like in the institution of marriage, including enforcing his own views on what marriage is (ie. between one man and one woman) even if it leads to unequal treatment of gay couples. I only have the wikipedia article to go on, and from that article I get the vague impression that he'd gladly vote for all the DOMAs and Prop8s that come his way. So, if the glitter assault had really been about gay marriage, and if we accept glitter as a legitimate mode of expression, he would in fact have been an appropriate target.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote