
Originally Posted by
Loki
wiggin, I really don't understand your logic. Is it your contention that we should wait until ~2014 (when the economy should hopefully grow at a decent rate) to lower the deficit? Beyond the fact that this will add $2 trillion to the deficit (and thus at least $40 billion in yearly interest payments), A) what are you going to do in 2014, and B) what are you going to do when the inevitable recession strikes in 2016 or 2017? My bet is you refuse to cut the deficit by more than $200-300 billion a year in 2014 and 2015 because that would hurt growth! And then you'd call for higher spending in response to the recession, which means back to 10% deficits. How you think this is a sustainable policy is beyond me.