Quote Originally Posted by wiggin View Post
Could you please elaborate? I freely admit that it might not work legally; I am NOT a lawyer, and certainly not an expert in UK law. But from a perspective of right and wrong, I think I'm on solid ground here.
With the principle that land or property that was gained unjustly in the past should not be retained by it's current owner? I don't think there's a state in the world that wouldn't have to give up large chunks of territory. Israel and the U.S especially.