Judge overturns Calif. gay marriage ban

[RandBlade]

I've told you before and I'll tell you again. That's not what Loving did. The case was explicitly limited to invidious racial discrimination by the authoring justice, applying a heightened legal standard which SCOTUS has regularly denied should be applied to homosexuality. Loving is not and will not be precedent here.

Loving is cited as precedent on page 2 of the ruling. In combination with the 14th Amendment.

EDIT: Been reading the first few dozen pages of the judgement, it's interesting. Loving is cited repeatedly as precedent.