Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
A person for whom the matter of freedom of movement of persons is more important than all the other aspects of Brexit is very likely to be a racist, but this misses the point of that exchange. The point is that pretty much all versions of Brexit that retain the freedom of movement are nevertheless likely to result in an outcome that does a great deal "about the reasons they voted to leave in the first place" so your characterization was inaccurate.

What kind of "compromise"--that isn't inimical to the core values, guiding principles and survival of the EU--would you like to see? Can you give some specific examples?
Sorry, but I have to call this out right here. It's garbage to say that changing/limiting immigration as a primary goal is inherently racist. It's as garbage as saying fighting to keep the Kroner is inherently racist.

Policy is policy, and it's absurd to suggest that people who wish to control their borders are racist. The core founding values of the EU were peace and stability through economic union. Not the right of trust-fund hipsters to cruise from city to city on a whim.

This Zionism immigration limits = racisme mindset is a poison to politics on all sides of the Atlantic.