Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
So approximately 95% of people known to have been killed by the Police were armed and approximately 5% were not? Approximately 3% were neither armed nor fleeing?

I didn't say body cams being on were the norm. I said body cams being on should be the norm. Body cams being off should not be an option. The only time a body cam shouldn't be filming is if it is faulty or obstructed. It should only be off when an officer is eg going into the toilet [the only place CCTV would never normally be found] and I can't imagine many shootings occurring in bathrooms.
Go through the dataset. A bit more than half are armed with a gun. Quite a few missing data points. Regardless, you find 29 unarmed people being gunned down by the police in half a year acceptable?

Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
And that fact right there 57 out of 559 is why change is needed. And you saying "waaah even if the body cam is on it doesn't matter" DOESN'T help. Society should get serious about auditing the police to ensure they are using body cams.

What is also amusing in the race solely lens you view things Loki is that more white guys have been killed than black guys by the police, despite the fact that there are more homicides commuted blacks than those committed by whites. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf And of course an overwhelming number of men have been shot over women (though again the overwhelming number of murderers are men so this makes sense).
Really? And how many of those 57 were convicted of a crime, Lewk? Jurors like you still vote not guilty.