Quote Originally Posted by Wraith View Post
Worth clicking through to the article for the redacted versions of the e-mails. In them, Eastman implies that Clarence Thomas may have been more involved with the plot to overthrow the government than previously known, to nobody's surprise.
I don't see how you can read it like that. The Justices handle emergency matters for certain regions. They thought pressing a case in Georgia would land them on Thomas' desk and that would be favorable to them. It's called judge shopping. Doesn't at all mean Thomas was "involved" in the manner you imply.