Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
A) Cut most university fees
B) "plans for a rail renaissance, reopening closed railway lines and new stations and building a High Speed Network"
C) "oppose all airport expansion serving London and the South East"
D) "buses and trains should be affordable and reliable so people can have a real choice about how to travel"
E) "increase the number of apprenticeships, and places on university and vocational higher education courses"
F) " raise the threshold at which people start paying income tax from current levels to £10,000, cutting the average working age person’s income tax bill by £700 and cutting pensioner’s income tax bills by £100."
G) "will give people the power to stop hospital closures in their area through elected local health boards"
H) "putting 3,000 more police officers on the beat"

That's just from going through their official platform.
Right. Ill attempt a relatively brief encounter with this, since its half 2am, lolli wont show me her boobs and ive drank a lot of whiskey.

First, a,b,c and d will not happen, will happen only in a vague way, or will happen in a way that doesnt reflect the realities of the issue.

e & f seem policies which the party would probably push. the first especially is already a priority for labour and so the lib dems if elected would prob be able to just hi-jack any progress made.

g is rediculous and i do not support it but it probably wont happen anyway.

h putting police officers on the beat is a standard promise. if they do it then i was prob right to vote for them, as police presence is linked strongly to a reduction in crime and if they do not do this then they are proven to be liars or not fit to be in charge.

More importantly, they will not get into power.

Secondarily, my constituency is fairly solidly tory (~#30 labour target) but the local guy is pretty good. thats my real dilemma. local vs national voting.