*Strokes moustache*
Ha, nice try. You almost had me, there. It's a trade-weighed index... Well, we're buying more cheap goods from China than before, and fewer goods from Europe (edit: RELATIVELY), so obviously it wouldn't fall as much.
I'm saying that the overall effect of a flood of cheap goods from another country is to lower the CPI (versus those cheap goods NOT coming in), even if commodity prices increase (otherwise, why buy those goods?). I don't see why you are asking me for a source for this...Source?
Or deflation, as you were saying. But I don't think we have deflation.*yawns* We want inflation, it's the hyperinflation that's the problem.
I'm saying that the Fed has to look at both the CPI and the entirety of the economic situation.So? Doesn't have anything to do with Fed policy.
Hmm, not sure. What's this, then? http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=JPYUh, not true. Deficits increased steadily from 1991 or so to 7.4% of GDP in 2000. Regardless, I recognize that Japan and the US are hardly similar, but they're a lot more similar than the US and, say, Greece.
That's not my point... My point is that trade does not benefit everyone in the economy equally if the wealth does not diffuse through.This is the same argument made about immigrants taking our jobs. It's simply wrong. This is not a zero sum game.Originally Posted by Agamemnus
O? Which one?Those numbers are disputed. See my earlier thread about this.Originally Posted by Agamemnus
The trade deficit!! AAAAAAAAAAAARHHHHHHHGGGKIGY&N(G^&*VD%^VD^&VW$%BExw v5erase7f8e4t <---- I make my passwords like this... in a fit of indescribable insanity!What does structural unemployment have to do with China?





Reply With Quote