Quote Originally Posted by Illusions View Post
I'm with him on this one. Also he wasn't referring to intimidation, well at least not in the form of "Nice house, it'd be a real shame if something were to happen to it."
Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
It's batshit insane to keep referring to boycotts, a commonplace, legitimate, non-violent means of applying economic pressure, typically for political ends, as a criminally violent endeavor. If you can't acknowledge that it's not "thuggery" then you can't form a rationale conclusion about anything. The very best you're aspiring to is being the stopped clock that's right twice a day, approaching accuracy by accident.
Fuzzy is raising a petty and semantic argument. What isn't intimidating about what these public employees have done so far?

For the 20th time, I think it's fine if private sector workers want to do this. When a bunch of government workers come by and talk about boycotting your business if you don't support them getting a pay raise, it fundamentally undermines the relationship between people and their government.

Why this is such a difficult concept to grasp is beyond me.