No, it's not "lame" at all. It is, after all, a Murdoch empire. Rupert's son was in charge of UK operations, and he testified on behalf of the company years ago when the hacking scandal first came to light. Rupert's daughter is also in charge of some operations, so it's a Family Affair.
If CEO's and corporate owners aren't where the buck ultimately stops, then what's that mean---they're just paying others to be the fall guys?
