Quote Originally Posted by CitizenCain View Post
Going for new heights of lunacy, I see. Not the option I would have chosen, but fine.

Do you really not see what you're doing? You're defending that orignal statement by saying we can't apply modern standards to an era so far in the past... and that statement (about a guy from 2000 years ago) ends with: "by today's standards."

Massive fail.
No, I don't think you understand. What is so difficult for you to comprehend?

Lets try this again slowly and logically, please identify by number which part of it you fail to agree with/comprehend:

1: We were talking about a guy 2000 years in the past.
2: Geegee made a claim.
3: That claim is ridiculous today
4: But that claim was very valid 2000 years ago.
5: QED it was not unreasonable.