Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 308

Thread: Election predictions

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    Then what's the big deal in sharing a simple citation that would answer my question?
    You want a citation for a negative. The Speaker has no special voting powers. None whatsoever, in any context. The only relevance the position holds beyond the purely internal rules of order the House chooses to operate under is that the Speaker has a defined place in the government's line of succession.
    Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Incidentally Steely 269-each gets resolved quite simply. If it happened it probably could (amusingly enough) result in Romney-Biden as the House (R) chooses the President and the Senate (D) chooses the Veep.
    I know that, but I think the idea is that people would be very unhappy about an election decided that way.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I don't get your question. The speaker doesn't get any special say in the process. Forgot to mention another twist: the House votes by state delegation, with each state getting one vote. Would be interesting to see what happens when a delegation is evenly split between Democrats and Republicans.
    That one's easy and has precedent. If the Reps of a State in the House split evenly then that state casts no vote towards getting a majority of States. Again like the Electoral College you need an absolute majority (not plurality) so that harms both candidates chances as the bar remains 26 states not 25.

    Unlike the Electoral College the House votes repeatedly until it gets a result. I believe the record is 36 rounds of votes being required until a decision was made.

    GGT he's given a citation. It doesn't matter though as its blocks of States that matter not individual Reps and certainly not one Rep alone.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  4. #64
    I don't pretend to be so wise as to be able to predict this. All I have been able to accurately predict is stumping for Obama by various corners of the coastal media elite.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
    I don't pretend to be so wise as to be able to predict this. All I have been able to accurately predict is stumping for Obama by various corners of the coastal media elite.
    Make your prediction. Don't be a weenie.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    That one's easy and has precedent. If the Reps of a State in the House split evenly then that state casts no vote towards getting a majority of States. Again like the Electoral College you need an absolute majority (not plurality) so that harms both candidates chances as the bar remains 26 states not 25.
    I suppose. It's far from clear that every Congressman would vote along party lines though.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I suppose. It's far from clear that every Congressman would vote along party lines though.
    Which leads to same point as made about faithless electors. It means non-even could equally cause an even result too. Surely in this day and age if anyone (in the first round at least) voted against their party they'd be expelled from the party.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  8. #68
    For thirty years, I have plotted against the Party

    I am sick, of mind and body
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Which leads to same point as made about faithless electors. It means non-even could equally cause an even result too. Surely in this day and age if anyone (in the first round at least) voted against their party they'd be expelled from the party.
    We have a candidate-oriented system here. Party expulsions are incredibly rare (and usually happen for criminal behavior) and are generally not a credibly deterrent. People usually get threatened with bad committee assignments, no chairmanships, and no votes on their pork projects. Even then, someone from say the deep south might be willing to ignore those incentives because of how unpopular Obama is down there.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  10. #70
    Senior Member Flixy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    6,435
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Which leads to same point as made about faithless electors. It means non-even could equally cause an even result too. Surely in this day and age if anyone (in the first round at least) voted against their party they'd be expelled from the party.
    Well, electors are elected to cast their vote for a candidate, whereas a congressman is elected to represent his constituency. I would imagine some voting for what their constituency wants rather than his party.
    Keep on keepin' the beat alive!

  11. #71
    The Meso-Americans did their own research over a millennia ago and predicted a Romney win in 2012, closely followed by the end of the world.

  12. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    We have a candidate-oriented system here. Party expulsions are incredibly rare (and usually happen for criminal behavior) and are generally not a credibly deterrent. People usually get threatened with bad committee assignments, no chairmanships, and no votes on their pork projects. Even then, someone from say the deep south might be willing to ignore those incentives because of how unpopular Obama is down there.
    I can not imagine the DNC or any Democratic caucus ever forgiving a (D) Congressman voting to elect a (R) President. Especially given these are not secret ballots.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  13. #73

  14. #74
    They voted for other (D)s not (R)s.

    Plus Speaker is very different to POTUS.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  15. #75
    They could very easily pull the same stunt (i.e. abstain). There are quite a few Democratic candidates in the South who refuse to say anything about Obama.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  16. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    http://election.princeton.edu/

    Obama: 323
    Romney: 215
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
    "For Romney to Win, State Polls Must Be Statistically Biased"

    Obama: 305.3
    Romney: 232.7
    These are starting to align a little better.
    538 has Obama at 307.2 and Romney at 230.8 and princeton has Obama at 305 and Romney at 233.

    and before Loki has another hissy fit, I'm going to give Romney Ohio, Florida, and Virginia for shits and giggles, but give the other Dem leaning battleground states to Obama. So 272 to 266.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 11-05-2012 at 02:58 PM.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  17. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/he...-along.html?hp

    With the above in mind, let's remove any possibility of people claiming that their intuition/gut was perfectly correct after the fact. I know there's a bigger prediction thread, but there's been a lot of new information available since then, and it's only fair to give people the opportunity to process that information and make more accurate predictions.

    So let's try to predict the following:

    Obama's number of electoral votes
    Obama's margin of victory/defeat in popular vote
    Number of Democratic (including candidates caucusing with the Democrats) Senators
    Number of Democrats in the House

    My predictions:

    281
    +1%
    52
    194
    290 (Obama gets Colorado, Ohio, NH, Wisconsin, Nevada. Loses Florida, Virginia.)
    +1.5% popular vote margin
    52 Senators
    194 Reps (kinda a guess, I know it'll be somewhere in that ballpark but I haven't looked at enough of the close races to really know.)

  18. #78
    Since certain people here don't seem to trust polls, I figured I'd put the predictions of the of the main poll aggregators, 538 and RCP.

    538:
    Colorado: Obama 2.7%
    Florida: Obama 0.2%
    Iowa: Obama 3.4%
    New Hampshire: Obama 3.7%
    North Carolina: Romney 1.6%
    Ohio: Obama 3.2%
    Virginia: Obama 2.2%
    Nevada: Obama 4.7%

    RCP:
    Colorado: Obama 1.5%
    Florida: Romney 1.5%
    Iowa: Obama 2.4%
    New Hampshire: Obama 2.0%
    North Carolina: Romney 3.0%
    Ohio: Obama 2.9%
    Virginia: Obama 0.3%
    Nevada: Obama 2.8%

    There are some ~1% differences between the two sources, but they predict the same outcome in each state. We'll see who's better (or if they both suck).

    For those expecting Romney to vote, note that Romney has to win almost every state where he's down by 2-3%.

    Edit: 538 made some last-second changes (all in the direction of Obama).
    Last edited by Loki; 11-06-2012 at 05:08 AM.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  19. #79
    Holy Crap, I can't believe someone's letting you maniacs vote tomorrow.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  20. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
    "For Romney to Win, State Polls Must Be Statistically Biased"

    Obama: 305.3
    Romney: 232.7
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I'm asking for your prediction, not to cite every poll aggregator.
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I'd put the predictions of the of the main poll aggregators, 538

    538:
    Colorado: Obama 1.7%
    Florida: Romney 0.3%
    Iowa: Obama 2.9%
    New Hampshire: Obama 3.2%
    North Carolina: Romney 2.0%
    Ohio: Obama 3.2%
    Virginia: Obama 1.5%
    Nevada: Obama 4.0%
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  21. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
    Holy Crap, I can't believe someone's letting you maniacs vote tomorrow.
    I voted a week back.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    *snip*
    I wanted people to see the exact predictions. It's not very hard to predict the specific states when 47 states have a greater than 2% margin.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  22. #82
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I voted a week back.
    This election seemed to go by a lot quicker than the others, though.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  23. #83
    Really? I don't think anything of substance happened in D.C. in the last year thanks to the election.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  24. #84
    I just haven't payed as much attention to it as the previous ones.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  25. #85
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    These are starting to align a little better.
    538 has Obama at 307.2 and Romney at 230.8 and princeton has Obama at 305 and Romney at 233.

    and before Loki has another hissy fit, I'm going to give Romney Ohio, Florida, and Virginia for shits and giggles, but give the other Dem leaning battleground states to Obama. So 272 to 266.
    Strangely enough Obama is doing a little bit better in polls recently. Pundits have said it was because of the storm let him look presidential. But I have a hard time believing anyone would change their vote because they see Obama hugging someone after a hurricane. Bizarre.

    I'm still optimistic about Romney but it might be closer then I would like. If Ohio doesn't go the right way... it doesn't look good.

  26. #86
    Obama's numbers were improving before the storm, and haven't really changed since then. The areas most affected by the storm - NY, NJ, and Connecticut - aren't exactly swing states anyway.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  27. #87
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Obama's numbers were improving before the storm, and haven't really changed since then. The areas most affected by the storm - NY, NJ, and Connecticut - aren't exactly swing states anyway.
    RCP poll of polls has steadily inched forward for Obama in the last week and a half. Romney was up about .5 and slowly its gone back toward Obama. Very annoying.

  28. #88
    You have to look at when those polls were taken.

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...ey-off-course/
    Hope is the denial of reality

  29. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    But I have a hard time believing anyone would change their vote because they see Obama hugging someone after a hurricane. Bizarre.
    Really? I don't. I think that most people vote based on party alliance or cast their ballot based on a random whim or half-assed line of reasoning they dreamed up in the shower one day. Hugging someone after a hurricane is easily enough to sway such people.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  30. #90
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    287 for Romney.

    Popular vote goes 2% for Romney.

    Senate/House I haven't been following as closely. In general Republicans keep house but don't win back the senate.
    Changing my prediction to Romney win with 275.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •