Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: 1 World Trade Center Open For Business

  1. #1

    Default 1 World Trade Center Open For Business

    After years of costly delays and political infighting, the crown jewel of the new World Trade Center complex will finally be open for business Monday, welcoming its first wave of workers.

    About 175 employees from anchor tenant and publishing giant Condé Nast — whose employees include Vanity Fair’s Graydon Carter, Vogue’s Anna Wintour and the New Yorker’s David Remnick — will move into offices on floors 20 through 44 of the 104-floor “Freedom Tower,” officially 1 World Trade Center.

    Although they won’t have access to the 1,776-foot skyscraper’s breathtaking 102nd-floor observation deck before it opens in the spring, the new tenants are happy to be part of lower Manhattan’s latest chapter.

    “Condé Nast is proud to be a part of this important moment of renewal for the city of New York,” said Condé Nast spokeswoman Patti Rockenwagner.
    “We are excited about contributing to the vitality of this community for years to come.”

    Rockenwagner said the 3,400 staffers who are slated to move will not relocate all at once. The company is planning to move in stages from its Times Square offices with plans to fill its new home by the end of February.

    New Yorkers and tourists celebrated another milestone in the area’s remarkable comeback.

    “It’s a beautiful thing,’’ said a construction worker Sunday at the WTC site, where he has toiled or 12 years. “People were depressed from before. Now, they are more happy that they see a positive change.’’

    Krisy Steelman, 35, who was visiting from Georgia, said the tower’s opening is important for the entire country.

    “I think everyone will be excited about that,” Steelman said. “It symbolizes growth, renewal, a fresh start, the unity of our country and what we’re able to do. I’m glad we live in a county where if something bad happens, we are able to make it better.”

    Also new to the neighborhood is a battalion of added police officers. Nearly 50 Port Authority cops patrolled the area in the days before 9/11. That number has since doubled, with plans for up to 200 by the time all the signed tenants move in.

    The tallest building in the Western Hemisphere, which cost $3.9 billion to build, was originally scheduled to open in 2006, but cost overruns and political infighting caused several delays.

    Condé Nast was one of the first major tenants to sign a lease. Other tenants include the General Services Administration and the advertising firm Kids Creative.

    Although the Port Authority, which owns the tower, has hailed the opening, only 60 percent of the building has been leased, which has observers worried.
    But some New Yorkers said you can’t put a price on freedom.

    “It’s incredible that it’s back in business,” said Ilene Danuff, 55, of Chelsea, who works in advertising. “We brush ourselves off and move on. It shows that it’s a resilient city with resilient people, and I’m happy to be in New York.”
    Source

    Only took 13 years and change.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    I hope I never have any business associates or clients (or employers) in that building. Though I bet the views are hauntingly great.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
    I hope I never have any business associates or clients (or employers) in that building. Though I bet the views are hauntingly great.
    Seems like the world's villains would LOVE to knock this new one down too. I would assume security on the ground would be awesome... but what about the air? Conventional wisdom is US airlines are more secure than ever before, but still....
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  5. #5
    If they could hijack a plane, they already would have. And I doubt the people on the plane would allow the plane to be used as a missile today.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    If they could hijack a plane, they already would have. And I doubt the people on the plane would allow the plane to be used as a missile today.
    But still . . . .
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  7. #7
    I have to admit I think this one looks kinda ugly, no idea what it looks like irl but the photoes don't really speak to my heart
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  8. #8
    Too bad Christopher Hitchens didn't get to see it happen that was one of his desires. I think this is all in all symbolically good, and a step in the right direction.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Timbuk2 View Post
    Less emotional/sentimental with the sound turned off.

    While it's nice to think that 'rebuilding' the World Trade Center after 9-11 is telling terrorists to go to hell....the truth is otherwise, and even more confused. It probably takes more ID to enter that building than it does to fly private or charter planes in NYC airspace.

  10. #10

  11. #11
    Yeh I saw that in the papers this morning. Scary stuff.


  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    I have to admit I think this one looks kinda ugly, no idea what it looks like irl but the photoes don't really speak to my heart
    It actually looks decent in real life, somewhat distinct due to size and styling but not very distinct. It's already mostly blended when I see the skyline.

  13. #13
    Regarding the window washing.....I'm not sure why we can't clean skyscraper windows using Smart Technology that doesn't mean hanging a human being 70 stories up on scaffold or rope devices, which then requires Fire/Police Departments and Hospitals to train and prepare as first responders or care providers.

    The "Window Washing Union" isn't strong enough to explain the decisions made by real estate developers, or how state policy is often swayed by corporate investors, is it?

  14. #14
    It's been tried, but it happens to be something machines aren't that good at (yet). Especially because all buildings are different shapes. At the least it requires a lot of customized software. At the most, each building requires a fairly customized robot.

    The price point is blah and the reliability is blah.

    Worth reading: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...ife-at-the-top

  15. #15
    Oh, come on, the price of any window cleaning robot is negligible compared to a skyscraper. One Canada Square has an automatic machine (and an additional manual one).
    "Wer Visionen hat, sollte zum Arzt gehen." - Helmut Schmidt

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
    It's been tried, but it happens to be something machines aren't that good at (yet). Especially because all buildings are different shapes. At the least it requires a lot of customized software. At the most, each building requires a fairly customized robot.

    The price point is blah and the reliability is blah.

    Worth reading: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...ife-at-the-top
    Interesting article

    I agree with EJ -- the technology is available. Retro-fitting old windows, using vertical robotics (or even tiny drones) wouldn't mean putting human lives at risk....just to wash windows. But building owners and property managers don't like the blah price point, probably because it's "cheaper" to pay the insurance premiums for human injury/death indemnity than buy the latest technology.

    The UAE (Abu Dhabi?) opened a new glass-facade skyscraper this year using non-human window-washing techniques, and they have to deal with sand dust and desert heat that can fritz motors/electronics! If they figured out how to do it (when they have a surplus of cheap labor) then we can do the same. Right?

  17. #17
    Retro-fitting old windows? That's a different story. We speak about a new skyscraper here.
    "Wer Visionen hat, sollte zum Arzt gehen." - Helmut Schmidt

  18. #18
    Okay, but there are old buildings (in the US) that still use human window-washers instead of latest or smartest technology. Their owners/operators/managers don't consider themselves part of "new skyscraper" risk management.

  19. #19
    It's much more expensive to add features to an object that wasn't designed for it in the first place than to implement it if you start with something new.
    "Wer Visionen hat, sollte zum Arzt gehen." - Helmut Schmidt

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •