Results 1 to 30 of 1916

Thread: Geopolitical impact of Brexit

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Enoch the Red View Post
    Just to be clear, are you arguing that because someone says or does something asshole-ish, they can't ever be or say something sensible? Do you need to be aware of the entirety of someone's beliefs and opinions on all subjects before you can agree with them about anything?

    More to the point, how sensible is it to have a man with such backwards views hold a leadership position in the EU?
    Rand called him a sensible man. He didn't say Fico was right only on the cited issue.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Rand called him a sensible man. He didn't say Fico was right only on the cited issue.
    Surely you realize that is shorthand for, that thing I quoted that this person said is something I can agree with. It's hard to believe that you are debating in good faith when you are trying so hard to tar Rand at the expense of rational thought.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Enoch the Red View Post
    Surely you realize that is shorthand for, that thing I quoted that this person said is something I can agree with. It's hard to believe that you are debating in good faith when you are trying so hard to tar Rand at the expense of rational thought.
    Unfortunately for your argument, Rand still insists the Muslim ban is no big deal.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Unfortunately for your argument, Rand still insists the Muslim ban is no big deal.
    Bullshit. Rand insists the Muslim ban is not as bad as an even worse alternative.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Unfortunately for your argument, Rand still insists the Muslim ban is no big deal.
    I don't want to ban Islam, so why would I want to ban Judaism or Christianity?
    Saying there is a difference between racism and religious discrimination isn't supporting a ban. Saying that governments should be in charge of their own immigration policies isn't supporting a ban. Agreeing with someone on a completely separate topic isn't supporting a ban. Why don't you show me where he supported a ban.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •