I don't think refraining from using the state's police power to select people's outerwear for them constitutes an extreme position. You don't even need to cite any religious grounds to support letting people make that decision rather than the government.
So long as there is no restraint elsewhere for restricting garments then absolutely. If however there is a perfectly valid restraint then should that be superceded by religion?
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.