Violent fascists in Israel's political establishment have a vested interest in undermining key tenets of international law and increasing international political tolerance for war crimes in service to the dehumanization project. It may be detestable, but it's understandable from their detestable perspective—their entire political reality depends on it. The same can't really be said for weird creepy nerds all over the world who've latched on to mealy-mouthed war crime apologetics as their personal special interest of choice. Granted, customary internet law has a well-established prohibition on yucking people's yums, but it can't be denied that there are better yums to be had. Hate seeing this most annoying of niche nerd hobbies getting another renaissance in 2023.
Deliberately starving besieged civilians is illegal. People who aren't war-crime apologists have steadily moved towards a more expansive understanding of this prohibition, under which "incidental" but predictable and significant violations of civilians' right to freedom from hunger are considered illegal under most circumstances; self-serving criminals and their contemptible water carriers, meanwhile, disagree. Who to believe hmm idk idk it's so difficult.




Reply With Quote