Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
All those words, and you didn't address a single fucking thing. That takes skill.

Here, let me do even more of the work for you. Think you can find some dirt to throw on the AAFP?

Now the question is, how many do you consider a "ton", how far back are you willing to consider, and if you are willing to admit the death rate only increases the further back in history you go.
Amazing how angry and emotional you're getting. It's almost like someone made a comment about an action movie you like or something.

Yes, thank you for linking to a physician lobbying group. Which asserts that, as of 1982, "Death is rare, and mortality risk has been estimated to be 1/500,000 procedures."

Also, the death rate for just about any procedure increases further back in history. What's your point? See, you've just introduced a whole new issue about historical mortality. And now you're going to claim that I haven't addressed it since page two even though you just brought it up.

Quote Originally Posted by Nessus View Post
No, you've just been posting page after page that everyone who questions circumcision is ridiculous and a little gay, "I mean who talks about dicks, right, it's the fags", you've been incredibly intellectually dishonest and for what, I must wonder
Eh? Really, the gays? I brought that up?

I fail to see how I can be intellectually dishonest when I'm a foreskin agnostic. I don't care if a parent chooses circumcision or not for their kids. But folks here are casually throwing out words like "mutilation" and "mortality" with no real basis, just an emotional response.

The apoplectic responses here are sorta fascinating.