Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: So, why is PayPal not regulated like a bank again?

  1. #1
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239

    Default So, why is PayPal not regulated like a bank again?

    Since some of you guys like Minecraft, I thought I'd point out this little gem to you:

    Working on a Friday update, crying over paypal
    I’m working on a Friday update which will include several minor but frequently requested updates.

    My development speed has taken a major toll with all the recent developments, as I’ve been in meetings every day this week except for today. I keep telling myself it’s for the best so I’ll have plenty of time to do actual development later on, but at the moment it’s a bit frustrating. And exciting. At the same time. :O

    And.. Paypal. On the 25’th, they limited my account for unspecified reasons (a suspicious withdrawal or deposit! wow, thank you for that amazingly detailed information), and asked me for a bunch of vague documents. I did my best to give them what they asked for.

    My account is still limited. I’ve called them three times, they keep telling me it’s being reviewed. Most recently they told me it’d take up to two more weeks for it to get resolved, and that if they decide something bad’s being going on, they’re going to keep the money.

    There’s over 600000 euro in there. Money I was planning on investing in the new company.

    I’m sure it’ll get sorted out, but this is kind of frustrating.

    [edit:] Just to clear things up: I withdraw everything from paypal every week. They limited my account just as sales started spiking, so this money has accumulated since they limited the account.
    http://notch.tumblr.com/post/1096322...ng-over-paypal

    That's one of the reasons I'll never use PayPal - I tried once, but they wouldn't accept neither my credit card nor my bank account for an eBay transaction. And didn't tell me why (or couldn't), besides the standard reason: "Computer says no!"
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  2. #2
    Reddit is all butthurt over this. Paypal does this constantly to small businesses, and has for years. I remember the guy who made afterburner kits (backlights) for the Gameboy Advance was forced to shut down because Paypal kept confiscating his funds.

    I really wish Google would put more love into Google checkout so we can all forget about such a horrible company.

  3. #3
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    I'd sic a lawyer at them the instant they'd try to pull such a stunt to me.

    I mean, 600,000€? The loss of interest at that amount of money is non-negligible.
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  4. #4
    Yeah, this is to all intents and purposes stealing if they try and keep the money.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  5. #5
    It seems silly to judge based on this information unless he specifies what documents they are asking of him. For all we know, they are asking for legitimate tax documents so that he doesn't cheat on his taxes or uses PayPal for some kind of money laundering scheme. Regulation probably has little to do with it.

    But there is a reason this is becoming a competitive space. Google has been developing Checkout for years (a bit too slowly) and Amazon has their own version: https://payments.amazon.com/sdui/sdui/business/cba

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
    It seems silly to judge based on this information unless he specifies what documents they are asking of him. For all we know, they are asking for legitimate tax documents so that he doesn't cheat on his taxes or uses PayPal for some kind of money laundering scheme. Regulation probably has little to do with it.
    Guilty until you prove yourself innocent? Sounds like paypal!
    This is not a new process that paypal is attempting. They fucked over a lot of organizations that tried to raise money for Katrina 5 years ago. SomethingAwful has the best writeup about it.
    http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news...co-summary.php

    Quote Originally Posted by The Paypal Fiasco: In Summary

    Well what a week it's been! Let me provide a quick rundown of the exciting events for everybody out there unaware of the entire story.

    1) Hurricane slams into the New Orleans area. I'm assuming most of you knew this occurred, and for those of you who didn't: please send me samples of whatever drugs you're taking.

    2) The Something Awful servers, hosted by the brave men at Zipa / DirectNIC, switched to emergency backup power generators to keep everything alive. They fueled these massive power sources with oil barrels collected from the faces of anime convention attendees.

    3) While the generators received sufficient power, their OC3 connections (the big fat lines connecting their servers to the rest of the world) began failing one by one, as ISPs in the area either fled, flooded, or realized they weren't going to risk their lives to make sure local residents could search the Internet for "Blossom" pornography. By the way, yes, it does exist. And no, you do not want to see it.

    4) Something Awful, one of Zipa / DirectNICs most bandwidth-intensive customers, had to be taken offline so their other 8,000 customers could stay up. This is comparable to shooting the morbidly obese 900-pound fat guy taking up space in a nuclear fallout shelter so 20 other people can fit into the area he was consuming. And, judging by the rescue footage of New Orleans, this is a scenario we might very well encounter in the near future.

    5) All communication in the New Orleans area went down (obviously), which made it near impossible to contact our server admin who lived down there. To temporarily get SA up, I bought some crappy hosting on a Dreamhost plan, which had an absolutely painfully idiotic name like "THE ULTRA SUPER AWESOMNATOR INSANITY WEBHOSTING MEGAPLAN 2000." It made me feel intensely embarrassed, but sometimes we have to sacrifice our humility in times of crisis, not that I had any pride to begin with.

    6) I decided to host a fundraiser to generate money for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, so I created a Paypal account for people to send in money, which would go to the Red Cross. The entire reason I chose to use Paypal was so I could collect the names and addresses of each donor and send them some free Something Awful merchandise for their contributions. Trust me, I would've rather had people donate directly to the Red Cross, but they would not provide me with the names and address of those who contributed.

    7) The fundraiser was a blistering success, raising over $30,000 in under nine hours.

    8) Paypal decided this was awfully suspicious, so they immediately locked the account without warning.

    Here's where the real problem begins. Now I have absolutely no qualms with Paypal raising a red flag when $30,000 flows into an account in less than half a day, to an account created hours earlier. Instead of saying, "gee, our company is making $1,188.37 from somebody (they charge 30 cents per transaction, there were 1284 transactions total = $385.20, and they charge 2.9% per transaction, there was $27,695.41 donated = $803.17), let's close them down without any notice," perhaps they should have employed a living, breathing human being to contact us and investigate before they froze the account without warning.

    Nope. Paypal decided to instantly freeze the account with no warning, no indication, no way for me to explain what was happening. You see, Paypal's outlook is that every single one of their customers is a liar, a cheat, and a thief. It's your job as their paying customer to prove them wrong. While you spend time faxing them all kinds of proof, including drivers licenses, social security cards, bank statements, and credit card statements, Paypal sits on your money and earns interest on it, making them even more cash. They can close, limit, freeze, or take money from your account whenever they like and for whatever reason they like; when you join their service, you must click a box agreeing to this policy.

    So how can they get away with this? I mean, banks can't rip off customers like this, can they? No, banks can't... but Paypal isn't a bank. They aren't governed by the FDIC. They literally answer to nobody. They hide customer service email contacts, rarely offer communication with actual human beings, and place functional phone numbers behind mounds of worthless distracting garbage.

    Regardless, I attempted to unfreeze my Paypal account by following their "six easy steps," which included me faxing in photos of my driver's license, recent bank statements, recent credit card statements, and a letter explaining I'm not a thief. I consider myself fortunate they did not ask for DNA samples, because the last time my wife caught me masturbating near the computer she almost divorced me. Unfortunately, the next step required made it literally impossible for me to unfreeze the $27,695.41 of donations so they could actually go to where people need them:

    Paypal was asking me to provide tracking numbers for DONATIONS. What am I supposed to send out? When did I ever say I was sending anything? How am I supposed to send it on Sunday? Where am I supposed to send it to? How exactly does Paypal's "donation" system, which is the option I chose for SA's Red Cross Relief Fund, work?


    I called up Paypal's customer support hotline, which I could find NOWHERE on their website and had to instead pry from the website Paypal Sucks, and was greeted by a series of automated messages informing me nobody could talk to me because it was after business hours. I guess, you know, nobody on the planet is expected to conduct business after Paypal closes for the day. And all you jerks on other, highly non-American continents: learn to stay up until 2:00 AM so you can sit on hold for half an hour and eventually talk to a customer service representative who personally hates you.

    After faxing in the necessary paperwork, Paypal's servers emailed a generic form reply explaining I would receive a response from an actual human being "between 3 and 5 business days." Well, today's a holiday, so that means at the latest, somebody would get back to me next Monday, which would be a total of NINE DAYS.I guess I could fold up a bunch of paper airplanes with the message "HANG IN THERE GUYS; PAYPAL MAY OR MAY NOT LET ME SEND YOU AID" in the general direction of New Orleans, but to be honest, I'm terrible at making those things. Every time I try, the airplane goes straight down and crashes into the pavement. Sometimes I can hear tiny, hollow screams of the paper pilots trapped inside the wreckage.

    I was mad. The donators were mad. Some Internet news sites picked up the fact that Paypal was generally screwing over not only contributors, but the people in New Orleans who needed the relief funds. All the negative publicity caused Paypal to cave in and physically force one of their employees to actually pick up a phone and contact me. She explained the same thing I already heard and knew: the Internet is full of thieves, they didn't know if I was planning on stealing the money and using it to purchase $27,695.41 worth of bathtub tiles, etc etc. I replied that while this logic is understandable, Paypal's entire mind set of "assume all our customers are guilty until they prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, they're innocent" is a bit ridiculous. I mean, here it was, every hour Paypal has the account frozen was another hour the victims of the hurricane lost $3,836.92 in donations, and the kind ladies and gentlemen at Paypal were saying it could essentially be up to NINE DAYS before anybody could donate again, and any of the money MIGHT be released to the Red Cross.

    I told the customer service representative that if they're so paranoid about me being a criminal, they could directly take the money from my Paypal account, completely lock me out of it, and donate it themselves to the Red Cross. Unfortunately, this too was impossible! You see, Paypal has no direct affiliation with the Red Cross, which somehow means they can't send money to them. Don't ask me how that works; last time I checked, the Red Cross accepted money from anybody anywhere. The Paypal representative said they can only donate money to the United Way; you know, the organization where the president was sued for stealing half a million dollars from them. You know, the organization with a loathsome two star rating, that spends nearly double the amount of money in "administrative overhead" (read: advertising) as Red Cross. It turns out that this is what the United Way is famous for. They weasel their way into companies and sign contracts with them, blocking the corporations from accepting donations to any other charity. I guess it's fitting Paypal chose to team up with them.


    To quote the magic eight-ball, "outlook not so good." After the surprising hostility Paypal showed in my attempt to raise money for the Red Cross hurricane relief fund, I realized there was no way to get the money from point A to point B as long as Paypal was point seeing the donations. I called the Paypal representative and instructed her to refund everybody's money. Although it's taken over a day for them to do it, they are issuing complete refunds (except for foreign money orders; anybody who used Paypal to convert foreign currency to US dollars have lost money on the "conversion fees"... despite the fact NO PHYSICAL MONEY CHANGED HANDS. I guess the mere process of adding one of those stupid "£" signs to a series of virtual numbers costs a lot of money).

    I had no business until today. The hurricane removed my entire source of income. I had no way to communicate with anybody near the data center, I had no way to contact my systems administrator, and I had no idea if and when our servers would be back online. All I was trying to do was raise money for the unfortunate victims of Hurricane Katrina, and SA's readers did an utterly amazing job generating nearly $4,000 an hour in contributions. Sure I was dreading having to pay postage on 1,284 envelopes full of SA merchandise, but what the heck; it was for a good cause. Then Paypal decided to step in and shut it all down.

    I'm not going to tell people to close their Paypal accounts. I'm not going to say all their actions were completely unwarranted. I'm just presenting my experience with them and will allow you to draw your own conclusions. However, I harbor a fundamental disagreement with their business practice of assuming all their clients are filthy criminals who must repeatedly prove their innocence to a series of unmanned servers and computer systems. I do not support their ability to freeze entire accounts, take money from whoever they want at whatever time they want, and impose whatever arbitrary rules and regulations they deem necessary without having to answer to any organization. Every single cent in every single Paypal account is earning their company ungodly amounts of interest in their central bank account. They offer users credit cards and the chance to put your money into interest-generating accounts. So exactly why are they not under banking and FDIC rules again?

    To everybody who donated: thank you, thank you from the bottom of my heart. Something Awful truly has the best community on the entire Internet, bar none. You people have raised $6,000 to buy toys for children with cancer and other fatal diseases. You donated $22,000 in armor plating for soldiers in Iraq. You even raised over $12,000 to buy a forum member a kidney when his failed and he was on critical life support. Now, when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, we raised over $30,000 in less than nine hours. Much like how the hurricane wiped out New Orleans, it's a shame Paypal wiped out your efforts to donate. I will begin another support drive shortly, once all the Paypal refunds have been sent.

    It will not be through Paypal.

    See, Paypal loves creating its own self fulfilling prophecies. You start selling a popular product following Paypal guidelines. Paypal locks your account because you went viral/popular. Paypal then holds your funding hostage until it decides, on its own time, that you are in fact trying to run a business. Its not just funds from a certain product, its your entire account. So you're left trying to fill orders within Paypal's time limt (I think its 30 days to ship), without funding (because Paypal took it). Obviously that doesn't work, so you start missing deadlines, you try communicating that its Paypal, but charges start getting reversed, and customers start thinking they got scammed, and Paypal uses that to justify fucking you over in the first place.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 09-10-2010 at 08:39 PM.

  7. #7
    The problem here, as with so many PayPal cases is their lack of transparency. You can't just say "there's some suspicious activity ("suspicious withdrawal/deposit/other") we're keeping all the money unless you give us [documents] after which we will we might still keep all the money". Frankly, if they really suspect money laundering, tax evasion or other fraud they should involve the authorities.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  8. #8
    I'm not denying they run a shit business. Based on my two experiences with them, I never use PayPal.

  9. #9
    You hear that PayPal? Not even Dreadnaught will defend you. That means you fucking suck.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  10. #10
    I'm pretty sure those are grounds for a fraud prosecution.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam/Istanbul
    Posts
    12,462
    Sounds real sucky. How come they don't need a banking license ?
    Congratulations America

  12. #12
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I'm pretty sure those are grounds for a fraud prosecution.
    They've already been the target of a class action suit at least once (2002 is one I know about), and a new one is in the works. The 2002 one ruled not in their favour.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hazir View Post
    Sounds real sucky. How come they don't need a banking license ?
    Because they're classified as a money transfer service. However, that also means that they are not allowed to hold back customers' money for a long period of time, usually a maximum of around a week is given.

    I also wonder why the EU didn't already slap them around with a big fish - since in they have a European banking license. Guess that means that every joker is allowed to run a bank now.

    I mean, the German tech magazine c't got involved once after PayPal took 100€ twice for the same transaction (and gave the customer the run around until c't got involved). Actual quote: "We don't know where the second 100€ have gone."

    And those guys deal with money. Incredible
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  13. #13
    Just Floatin... termite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Land of Milk & Honey
    Posts
    1,213
    Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
    You hear that PayPal? Not even Dreadnaught will defend you. That means you fucking suck.


    I like your work Glinty.

    Are there any useful alternatives to PayPal? Competition is usually the best way to deal with a company failing to satisfy its customers.
    Such is Life...

  14. #14

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
    You hear that PayPal? Not even Dreadnaught will defend you. That means you fucking suck.


    Now I'm going to be annoying and suggest that, while PayPal is a shit business, I don't think regulation is the answer. I don't think throwing around the vague and broad idea of "regulation" around whenever someone hears about a bad consumer experience. I would even go so far as to suggest that the draconian list of documents he's being asked to submit are because of regulations that PayPal is trying to comply with. But they can't because they are a shit company. If this guy's story is accurate and the dots are dotted, he probably has a strong case for fraud or theft.


    Quote Originally Posted by termite View Post


    I like your work Glinty.

    Are there any useful alternatives to PayPal? Competition is usually the best way to deal with a company failing to satisfy its customers.
    Google Checkout and Amazon Checkout/Amazon Payments are solid competitors (at least from the user experience side, I'm not sure about implementation). Though I think Google Checkout is not as good with a simple donation badge.

  16. #16
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post


    Now I'm going to be annoying and suggest that, while PayPal is a shit business, I don't think regulation is the answer. I don't think throwing around the vague and broad idea of "regulation" around whenever someone hears about a bad consumer experience. I would even go so far as to suggest that the draconian list of documents he's being asked to submit are because of regulations that PayPal is trying to comply with. But they can't because they are a shit company. If this guy's story is accurate and the dots are dotted, he probably has a strong case for fraud or theft.
    Uh, they'd simply have to comply to the same laws as banks do.

    Found another example:

    eBay Germany's CEO sold some tickets to the EM 2008 via eBay. On his auction page, he demanded double-sided photocopies of the buyer's identity card AND the credit card (both(!) sides. You know what that means for a credit card). He even stated the reason for demanding that:
    Because otherwise PayPal wouldn't guarantee that he got his money back in case of fraud.

    That's from an CEO of essentially the same company.

    The kicker: Anyone else who used that passage simply had their auction disappear.

    So, Dread, simply let the existing regulations loose at them - and watch PayPal crumble.

    And that shitlist of documents? The fun part: For some people they demand one paper. When that is sent, another one. Then another one. And sometimes they even demand trade secrets, for instance, from one guy they demanded to know from which supplier he got his wares at which conditions and so on. That's not something any sane business man will ever make public.
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  17. #17
    He would have a case, except that this sort of thing doesn't seem like a rare event for paypal. Even if he gets his money back, he'll have suffered in the meantime, but I don't think anyone's ever received compensation from paypal for this sort of nonsense. If anything they've lost money in "fees" for it.

    I dunno 'bout regulation, but at some point someone might need to come in and slap some people around and say "you can't inconvenience your customers just so that you can earn money on interest".
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  18. #18
    I've never used Paypal, would never want to use Paypal and would be quite content if Paypal didn't exist.

    However I have some issues with the Paypal/Katrina story.

    Here's where the real problem begins. Now I have absolutely no qualms with Paypal raising a red flag when $30,000 flows into an account in less than half a day, to an account created hours earlier. Instead of saying, "gee, our company is making $1,188.37 from somebody (they charge 30 cents per transaction, there were 1284 transactions total = $385.20, and they charge 2.9% per transaction, there was $27,695.41 donated = $803.17), let's close them down without any notice," perhaps they should have employed a living, breathing human being to contact us and investigate before they froze the account without warning.
    Actually a bank will often do the same thing. It pisses me off no end that sometimes when I've saved up for a while I'll buy a whole set of new things at once ... but because of the large transactions all at the same time it gets flagged as "suspicious activity" and rather than call me they put a block on my card ... even when it is well within the limit. I then have to call up to get it unblocked. My parents had it every Christmas with one company until they cancelled that card "we thought you were spending more than normal, it looks suspicious" ... "that's because its f***ing December!"

    This could have happened with a bank.
    Nope. Paypal decided to instantly freeze the account with no warning, no indication, no way for me to explain what was happening. You see, Paypal's outlook is that every single one of their customers is a liar, a cheat, and a thief. It's your job as their paying customer to prove them wrong. While you spend time faxing them all kinds of proof, including drivers licenses, social security cards, bank statements, and credit card statements, Paypal sits on your money and earns interest on it, making them even more cash. They can close, limit, freeze, or take money from your account whenever they like and for whatever reason they like; when you join their service, you must click a box agreeing to this policy.
    A bank could do the same.
    So how can they get away with this? I mean, banks can't rip off customers like this, can they? No, banks can't... but Paypal isn't a bank. They aren't governed by the FDIC. They literally answer to nobody. They hide customer service email contacts, rarely offer communication with actual human beings, and place functional phone numbers behind mounds of worthless distracting garbage.
    Again, a bank could.
    Regardless, I attempted to unfreeze my Paypal account by following their "six easy steps," which included me faxing in photos of my driver's license, recent bank statements, recent credit card statements, and a letter explaining I'm not a thief.
    Standard fare for creating a bank account. He couldn't have created an account online and received $30k in any bank without providing such documents.
    I called up Paypal's customer support hotline, which I could find NOWHERE on their website and had to instead pry from the website Paypal Sucks, and was greeted by a series of automated messages informing me nobody could talk to me because it was after business hours. I guess, you know, nobody on the planet is expected to conduct business after Paypal closes for the day. And all you jerks on other, highly non-American continents: learn to stay up until 2:00 AM so you can sit on hold for half an hour and eventually talk to a customer service representative who personally hates you.
    Try calling a bank out of banking hours
    After faxing in the necessary paperwork, Paypal's servers emailed a generic form reply explaining I would receive a response from an actual human being "between 3 and 5 business days." Well, today's a holiday, so that means at the latest, somebody would get back to me next Monday, which would be a total of NINE DAYS.I guess I could fold up a bunch of paper airplanes with the message "HANG IN THERE GUYS; PAYPAL MAY OR MAY NOT LET ME SEND YOU AID" in the general direction of New Orleans, but to be honest, I'm terrible at making those things. Every time I try, the airplane goes straight down and crashes into the pavement. Sometimes I can hear tiny, hollow screams of the paper pilots trapped inside the wreckage.
    1: Standard fare again
    2: Its not Paypal's fault he decided to use a weird system to get donations for the RedCross. Guess what, standard best-practice for donations to a charity is to donate directly to the charity! Again, he couldn't have created a bank account online without providing proof of anything, accept $30k, send it back out again to someone else all on a Sunday.
    I was mad. The donators were mad. Some Internet news sites picked up the fact that Paypal was generally screwing over not only contributors, but the people in New Orleans who needed the relief funds. All the negative publicity caused Paypal to cave in and physically force one of their employees to actually pick up a phone and contact me. She explained the same thing I already heard and knew: the Internet is full of thieves, they didn't know if I was planning on stealing the money and using it to purchase $27,695.41 worth of bathtub tiles, etc etc. I replied that while this logic is understandable, Paypal's entire mind set of "assume all our customers are guilty until they prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, they're innocent" is a bit ridiculous. I mean, here it was, every hour Paypal has the account frozen was another hour the victims of the hurricane lost $3,836.92 in donations, and the kind ladies and gentlemen at Paypal were saying it could essentially be up to NINE DAYS before anybody could donate again, and any of the money MIGHT be released to the Red Cross.

    I told the customer service representative that if they're so paranoid about me being a criminal, they could directly take the money from my Paypal account, completely lock me out of it, and donate it themselves to the Red Cross. Unfortunately, this too was impossible! You see, Paypal has no direct affiliation with the Red Cross, which somehow means they can't send money to them. Don't ask me how that works; last time I checked, the Red Cross accepted money from anybody anywhere. The Paypal representative said they can only donate money to the United Way; you know, the organization where the president was sued for stealing half a million dollars from them. You know, the organization with a loathsome two star rating, that spends nearly double the amount of money in "administrative overhead" (read: advertising) as Red Cross. It turns out that this is what the United Way is famous for. They weasel their way into companies and sign contracts with them, blocking the corporations from accepting donations to any other charity. I guess it's fitting Paypal chose to team up with them.
    Again, I doubt if a bank thought money had been raised illicitly that they could just give it direct to a charity.
    To quote the magic eight-ball, "outlook not so good." After the surprising hostility Paypal showed in my attempt to raise money for the Red Cross hurricane relief fund, I realized there was no way to get the money from point A to point B as long as Paypal was point seeing the donations. I called the Paypal representative and instructed her to refund everybody's money. Although it's taken over a day for them to do it, they are issuing complete refunds (except for foreign money orders; anybody who used Paypal to convert foreign currency to US dollars have lost money on the "conversion fees"... despite the fact NO PHYSICAL MONEY CHANGED HANDS. I guess the mere process of adding one of those stupid "£" signs to a series of virtual numbers costs a lot of money).
    Name a bank that doesn't charge "conversion fees", mine charges either 2.5% or 3% with a minimum of either £2 or £3

    Not responded to all points as some were fair, but for most ... banking regulations would not have stopped this.

  19. #19
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Not responded to all points as some were fair, but for most ... banking regulations would not have stopped this.
    Banking regulations would've stopped the "hey, we hold on to your money for three month for no good reason!"
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    I've never used Paypal, would never want to use Paypal and would be quite content if Paypal didn't exist.

    However I have some issues with the Paypal/Katrina story.

    Actually a bank will often do the same thing. It pisses me off no end that sometimes when I've saved up for a while I'll buy a whole set of new things at once ... but because of the large transactions all at the same time it gets flagged as "suspicious activity" and rather than call me they put a block on my card ... even when it is well within the limit. I then have to call up to get it unblocked. My parents had it every Christmas with one company until they cancelled that card "we thought you were spending more than normal, it looks suspicious" ... "that's because its f***ing December!"

    This could have happened with a bank.
    A bank could do the same.
    Again, a bank could.
    Standard fare for creating a bank account. He couldn't have created an account online and received $30k in any bank without providing such documents.
    Try calling a bank out of banking hours
    1: Standard fare again
    2: Its not Paypal's fault he decided to use a weird system to get donations for the RedCross. Guess what, standard best-practice for donations to a charity is to donate directly to the charity! Again, he couldn't have created a bank account online without providing proof of anything, accept $30k, send it back out again to someone else all on a Sunday.
    Again, I doubt if a bank thought money had been raised illicitly that they could just give it direct to a charity.
    Name a bank that doesn't charge "conversion fees", mine charges either 2.5% or 3% with a minimum of either £2 or £3

    Not responded to all points as some were fair, but for most ... banking regulations would not have stopped this.
    You're deeply confused on how Paypal isn't regulated as a bank, and thus isn't one, but can request the same personal information that a bank does. Even then, there is a huge difference between providing verification at account creation, and randomly deciding to it at some point down the line. Do we really have to go into how disabling a card (which can be corrected with a phone call), is not the same as holding an entire account hostage? I've had my debit card disabled before for a string of online purchases, and I missed the "did you buy all this stuff call", yet Brandy's card on the same account worked fine.
    The guy in the story admits that he understands that there should be precautions. However there also needs to be a fucking human on the other end. Holding a groups' money hostage, willy-nilly, for over a week minimum because there is no one working, is not "banking hours".

    Also amazed that you somehow manage to blame the victim because they wanted to donate as a group

  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Khendraja'aro View Post
    Banking regulations would've stopped the "hey, we hold on to your money for three month for no good reason!"
    Absolutely, 3 months is ridiculous. 3 working days is not.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    You're deeply confused on how Paypal isn't regulated as a bank, and thus isn't one, but can request the same personal information that a bank does. Even then, there is a huge difference between providing verification at account creation, and randomly deciding to it at some point down the line.
    What proportion of accounts get $30k in nine hours? Or €600k there should be extra security checks but there should be a sensible process for them.
    Do we really have to go into how disabling a card (which can be corrected with a phone call), is not the same as holding an entire account hostage? I've had my debit card disabled before for a string of online purchases, and I missed the "did you buy all this stuff call", yet Brandy's card on the same account worked fine.
    The guy in the story admits that he understands that there should be precautions. However there also needs to be a fucking human on the other end. Holding a groups' money hostage, willy-nilly, for over a week minimum because there is no one working, is not "banking hours".
    Yes it is. Try getting hold of a bank employee on a Sunday. He created an account without going through any security checks and was told after getting 30k it'd take 3 working days. Not 3 months
    Also amazed that you somehow manage to blame the victim because they wanted to donate as a group
    Victim? How is he a victim? He created a new account on a Sunday and got $30k in it, any bank would take a few days to process all that. Again besides the fact it's best practice to donate DIRECT to the charity. In as much as Paypal may have a ton of failings, this was hardly a major one. If this is the worst story it's scraping the barrel.

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Yes it is.
    No, no its not. A bank disabling a card does not lock a user out of their money. They are disabling a possibly comprised card that is withdrawing from an account. The account itself still works, including online bill paying, funds transfers, and other cards connected to the account.
    My bank has a 24 hour 800 number to handle both lost cards and false positives. Are you saying there is no one at your bank that can handle reporting a lost card on a Sunday?
    Time to find a new bank.

    Another problem is that Paypal disabled the Katrina account while it was still accepting donations. Instead of contacting a random sampling of contributions, or monitoring the activity, (especially since paypal withdrawals are far from instant). They killed it without any thought in the matter. Adding to the fact that it would take 9 days before someone would start looking into it, sounds like poor programming with no human oversight.

    Its depressing that the best defense paypal has so far in this thread is the idea of "guilty first, innocent after you provide proof, and we get around to checking it".
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 09-12-2010 at 03:20 AM.

  23. #23
    Senior Member Flixy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    6,435
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Absolutely, 3 months is ridiculous. 3 working days is not.
    What proportion of accounts get $30k in nine hours? Or €600k there should be extra security checks but there should be a sensible process for them.
    Yes it is. Try getting hold of a bank employee on a Sunday. He created an account without going through any security checks and was told after getting 30k it'd take 3 working days. Not 3 months
    Victim? How is he a victim? He created a new account on a Sunday and got $30k in it, any bank would take a few days to process all that. Again besides the fact it's best practice to donate DIRECT to the charity. In as much as Paypal may have a ton of failings, this was hardly a major one. If this is the worst story it's scraping the barrel.
    IDK, in my experience 30k doesn't take days to process with banks. Though I can imagine a few thousand donations like this raise some flags. For what it's worth, anecdotal: i transferred 30k out of a bank account within 5 minutes once, without a problem whatsoever, transferred within a day.

    The biggest issue is, I think, the lack of transparancy, and unreachable customer service. When I have trouble with my bank I can at least reach them every business day and they fix the problem, fast. And at the very least they don't hold your money for months.

    edit: OG, my bank has a 24 hour line to block stolen cards, but you can't unblock stuff on that number. General customer support is on business hours.
    Keep on keepin' the beat alive!

  24. #24
    Paypal wants to keep 5% of Minecraft's profits. For as long as Paypal is used, and on top of all their other fees.
    This. This is why Paypal needs regulated like a bank. My accounts have no such ridiculous restrictions. This reeks of "I have altered the deal, pray I do not alter it any further."


    They locked this guy out of his account for over 2 weeks, and they still want to act like dicks.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    Paypal wants to keep 5% of Minecraft's profits. For as long as Paypal is used, and on top of all their other fees.
    This. This is why Paypal needs regulated like a bank. My accounts have no such ridiculous restrictions. This reeks of "I have altered the deal, pray I do not alter it any further."


    They locked this guy out of his account for over 2 weeks, and they still want to act like dicks.
    Seems like extortion. I'd go to the Feds.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  26. #26
    Reserves, not profits. Theoretically, the reserves are for people who want a refund because of potential damaged goods, etcetc... except it's not a physical product so .. lmao.

    He didn't take the time to find out that Paypal is not an honest business, and he got burned. He could have used Checkout or another service, but he chose the easy way out.

  27. #27
    No, he couldn't because Checkout isn't available in his country.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  28. #28
    Shush Steely, you are treading on his dreams.

    PS. I had no idea PayPal was this weird I wonder if he has any options for resolving this quickly and properly from Sweden.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  29. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    Shush Steely, you are treading on his dreams.
    Or another service.
    Does he live in Nowhereistan?


    PS. I had no idea PayPal was this weird
    Weird is not quite it... Unresponsive customer service, or maybe "horrific"...


    : I wonder if he has any options for resolving this quickly and properly from Sweden.
    He could complain to the BBB or their government, perhaps?

  30. #30
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by agamemnus View Post
    Or another service.
    Which other service might that be?
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •