Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
What an absolute baby you're being. I've never been attacked like this for explaining a law that I don't even support.
Maybe you should have been. And the word isn't "explaining" it's "rationalizing", though the part where you tried to blame this on healthcare reform, of all things, was by far the most offensive.

This bill is about funding for abortions, not defining or trivializing rape. For fuck's sake, click on the link and read parts of the bill.
I did click on the link and read the bill, just to check it said what the article says it said. It did. Fucks sake, yourself. I know the bill is about funding for abortions, but if, in order to achieve it's goals about abortion it says that rape is only really rape if it's forcible than that is just the same, morally, as if that was the reason for the bill. Is that so hart to understand?

Can you please explain where you see the trivialization of rape?
It's not a trivialization of rape, it's a trivialization of rape that doesn't involve the use of force, simply because it says that one is bad enough that the victim should have access to federal funds to pay for her abortion, while the other is "not as serious" and therefore doesn't require the provision of federal funding.

It's quite offensive for you to be acting like this.
It's quite offensive for you, with your bare face hanging out, to make the argument that public funding for medical procedures is actually to blame for this.

Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy
What I'm assuming and telling you is the only way it can work into the framework of existing state laws and the intersections between state and federal interaction on funding as it relates to criminal reporting.
Forgive me if I don't just take your word for it.