Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Artificial Leaves Bleed Solar Fuel

  1. #1

    Default Artificial Leaves Bleed Solar Fuel

    This line of research, IMHO, is far closer to the mark of producing a workable alternative to fossil fuel energy sources. All energy sources, except geothermal and nuclear, ultimately originate with the sun, so what we - civilization - are really doing is trying to figure out how to go from using the world's abundant supply of stored sunlight - aka fossil fuel - to using sunlight more directly from the sun.

    Solar photovoltaics is the most direct, of course. Wind and wave are two or so steps removed (sunlight drives temperature changes which heats and cools volumes of air which causes them to move around which is what we know as wind --- and wind makes waves). Hydro-electric is another step removed (Evaporation driven by heat from the sun, then rain, then run-off into dammed up rivers, then through turbines). Biofuels are removed by a growing season and a fermentation period. But its all sun-origin energy and harvesting it from these sources is not that difficult. But then using it to move vehicles from place to place and to electrify cities when and where there's no sun, wind or waves is not a simple matter. What is lacking is an efficient energy storage and transport medium.

    The two studies referenced in the article below represent advances on this front in the alternative energy arena, one with an eye toward molecular hydrogen as the medium and one looking to carbon monoxide. I find the carbon monoxide problem ironic since as a means of pollution control we have developed technologies (catalytic converters) to efficiently convert carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide (ie finish "burning" it...) but now the problem is how to efficiently convert it back. Heh.

    So they've come up with artificial "leaves" that make hydrogen from water and a low energy process for making CO2 into CO. Best of all, the source materials for these processes are cheap and abundant. Cool stuff, I must say. Sounds like the beginning of the beginning.
    Solar Fuels Take Two Steps Forward

    Two independent research teams report today in Science that they've taken key strides toward harnessing the energy in sunlight to synthesize chemical fuels. If the new work can be improved, scientists could utilize Earth's most abundant source of renewable energy to power everything from industrial plants to cars and trucks without generating additional greenhouse gases.

    Today, humans consume an average of 15 trillion watts of power, 85% of which comes from burning fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas. That massive fossil fuel consumption produces some nasty side effects, including climate change, acidified oceans, and oil spills. These problems are likely to grow far worse in coming years, as worldwide energy use is expected to at least double by 2050.

    Renewable power sources, such as solar photovoltaics and wind turbines, aim to fill this demand, and they are making steady progress at providing electricity at ever cheaper costs. But electricity has a key drawback as an energy carrier. It's difficult to store in large quantities, which means it can't be used for most heavy industry and transportation applications, such as flying planes or driving heavy trucks. So researchers have long sought to use the energy in sunlight to generate energy-rich chemical fuels, such as hydrogen gas, methane, and gasoline, that can be burned anytime anywhere. And though they have demonstrated that this goal is possible, the means for doing so have been inefficient and expensive.

    That's where the new advances come in. In the first, researchers led by Daniel Nocera, a chemist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, report that they've created an "artificial leaf" from cheap, abundant materials that splits water into molecular hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2), somewhat similar to the way plants carry out the first step in photosynthesis. The leaf consists of a thin, flat, three-layered silicon solar cell with catalysts bonded to both faces of the silicon. When placed in a beaker of water and exposed to sunlight, silicon absorbs photons of sunlight, generating electrons with enough energy to conduct through the silicon.

    The process leaves behind positively charged electron vacancies called "holes" that can also move through the material. The holes migrate to a cobalt-containing catalyst painted on one face of the silicon cell, where they strip electrons from water molecules, breaking them into hydrogen ions (H+), and oxygen atoms. The catalyst then knits pairs of oxygens together to make O2. Meanwhile, the H+ ions migrate to another catalyst on the opposite face of the silicon cell, where they combine with conducting electrons to make molecules of H2. In principle, the H2 can then be stored and either burned or run through a fuel cell to generate electricity.

    In the second study, a team led by chemists Richard Masel of Dioxide Materials in Champaign, Illinois, and Paul Kenis of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, report that they've come up with a more energy-efficient approach to converting carbon dioxide (CO2) into carbon monoxide (CO), the first step to making a hydrocarbon fuel. Other researchers have worked for decades to devise catalysts and the right reaction conditions to carry out this conversion. But converting CO2 to CO has always required applying large electrical voltages to CO2 to make the change. That excess voltage is an energy loss, meaning it takes far more energy to make the CO than it can store in its chemical bonds.


    But Masel, Kenis, and colleagues found that when they use a type of solvent for CO2 in their setup called an ionic liquid, it reduces the extra voltage needed approximately 10-fold. Ionic liquids are liquid salts that are adept at sabilizing compounds such as CO2 when they are given an extra negative charge, the first step in converting CO2 to CO. And the Illinois researchers suspect that this added stability reduces the need for applying an external charge to do the job.

    "These papers are nice advances," says Daniel DuBois, a chemist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Washington, who works on catalysts for both splitting water and reenergizing CO2. But he cautions that neither solves all of their respective issues. The oxygen-forming catalyst in the artificial leaf, for example, remains slow, DuBois says. And the efficiency of the overall leaf is only 4.7% at most, and just 2.3% in its most simplest design. The catalyst in the CO2 system is even slower. But DuBois says that because other researchers in the field now have a good examples of systems that work, they can now focus on designing improved catalysts to speed them up.
    Link: http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...rwa.html?rss=1
    Last edited by EyeKhan; 09-30-2011 at 06:10 PM.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  2. #2
    Since nobody bothered to comment, I thought maybe a jazzier title with a follow-up bump might get more notice.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeKhan View Post
    Since nobody bothered to comment, I thought maybe a jazzier title with a follow-up bump might get more notice.
    One of the things our group listed as research goals in our funding application was research into energy materials.

    That's all I got, man.
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeKhan View Post
    Since nobody bothered to comment, I thought maybe a jazzier title with a follow-up bump might get more notice.
    I read it, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to say here. Go science go?

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeKhan View Post
    All energy sources, except geothermal and nuclear, ultimately originate with the sun,
    Fission energy originates from a sun.

    I'm out too now.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Draco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    573
    Well that's very interesting news. There's certainly a lot of intriguing research being done, new types of fuel being invented, which is great. Not that I jump on the "save the world bandwagon" but at the least we won't have to rely on a certain region of the world that got all its wealth undeserved.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith View Post
    I read it, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to say here. Go science go?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •