Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Does Canada need to join the United States to survive

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    Using this mindset, there is nothing, no where, that someone couldn't have access to.
    So you have access to a perpetual motion machine? Or you had broadband access in 1990?

    That's total crap. GGT complained about the infrastructure to provide broadband existing in Canada. By your own source this infrastructure already exists to service 99.7% of the US population. You may be unhappy with the costs the companies servicing this infrastructure charge but that is a completely different kettle of fish to that infrastructure not being already in place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    So you have access to a perpetual motion machine?
    you simply haven't thrown enough money at the problem yet
    Or you had broadband access in 1990?
    broadband existed well before 1990, hell 45Mbps T3 existed before the 90s. The restriction was of course cost.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  3. #33
    And that it hadn't been rolled out: it has now, to 99.7% of the population. Regardless of if its 10, 20, 50 or 100 dollars a month it's not millions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    And that it hadn't been rolled out:
    It was, it was in several universities, one of the few places that could afford it. and in use at the current backbones at the time.

    100 dollars a month it's not millions.
    Comcast would love you. $100+ a month (ignoring installs and rentals) for 4mb access. Thats the type of thinking that allows you to distort or outright ignore the links I've been providing you.

    and that is the problem you're missing. currently in the US broadband providers don't provide to cities that aren't what they consider cost effective, and to start servicing those cities and towns you have to have a set number of people willing and able to grossly overpay for service, then they have to be able to afford the installation costs the provider would charge to start providing service in the first place. This allows the providers to claim that broadband is available, but not being requested, even when the infrastructure isn't there.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  5. #35
    Still a confusing thread. What's the debate about broadband got to do with Canada joining the US to survive....or Scotland leaving the UK?


  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    Still a confusing thread. What's the debate about broadband got to do with Canada joining the US to survive....or Scotland leaving the UK?
    My thoughts exactly.

    However the Canucks and Americans get along fine because we don't envy them and they don't envy us, which is why our relationship is good. They make fun of us as being hicks (I happen to know more than a few Canucks and they can be as redneck as anyone, so the idea that they are somehow enlightened is largely just something that certain areas like to claim), and they are our little brother, America Junior.

    If we had any kind of official relationship it would create issues, there is more animosity between Texas and New York than between US and Canada....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •