
Originally Posted by
Kazuha Vinland
if it is not the action that matters, but the foreseeable possibility of it happening which makes them guilty in this case... why not extend it to them being charged for felony murder, regardless if he had been shot or not? Because they did not shoot him, they just forgot to think about it as a plausible consequence, which they would be guilty of regardless of the outcome. Since the actual case of what happened is obviously not relevant here, all that remains is in fact, the poor risk evaluation being a crime fitting of 50 years sentence, no?