Not that I'm a fan of the feds, or the supremacy clause in general, but this does seem like one of the uncommon instances in recent memory where it's actually applicable and not just the fed-speak for "we get to do whatever the fuck we want to." Or am I missing some reason that the state of California charging $30 tax on a free handset is a valid reason to bring a massive class action lawsuit against AT&T?
Granted companies abuse the hell out of arbitration clauses in... everything, but it's hard to blame them when every jackass with a $30 dispute against a 3rd party tries to parlay it into a multi-million dollar lotto ticket against a big corporation.


Reply With Quote

