How is this entire paragraph anything but personal insults?
I responded to your arguments, such as they were, and you come back with this? After we (the forum) agreed to try and tone down the deconstruction of conversation?
I am sorry but I do not understand the distinction of "light" conversation and how exactly one is supposed to uphold to this invisible standard. Are we to indicate possible use of harsh terms in the thread title, perhaps?
This thread was opened with an article about
extending the "right" to marry small children. Why you are setting up this straw-man about banning marriages from consenting 16-year-olds I cannot comprehend.