Results 1 to 30 of 512

Thread: Judge overturns Calif. gay marriage ban

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Unmarried couples are, singles are not.

    The perk is a tax-free healthcare cover for a partner, singles don't have a partner.
    That's exactly what I said. Singles without partners (or children) don't get perks of any kind. Not in lower insurance rates or tax deductions.

    In fact, some singles will agree to 'marriages of convenience' just to get spousal health insurance coverage. Loophole or structural flaw?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    That's exactly what I said. Singles without partners (or children) don't get perks of any kind. Not in lower insurance rates or tax deductions.

    In fact, some singles will agree to 'marriages of convenience' just to get spousal health insurance coverage. Loophole or structural flaw?
    No that still doesn't make sense. Singles without partners aren't paying less in insurance rates than the married employees

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    No that still doesn't make sense. Singles without partners aren't paying less in insurance rates than the married employees
    Read it again.

    (Singles have to pay MORE for health insurance, when compared to being a partner add-on. We don't have a NHS.....)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •