Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 121 to 138 of 138

Thread: Peter Strzok

  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    How convenient that the investigation gets to continue straight through the mid-terms.
    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...longer-realize

    Not that you have ever shown yourself bright enough to learn from history.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 06-18-2018 at 03:43 PM.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  2. #122
    https://apnews.com/amp/44d8975dde6c42d08b09001484fe209b

    "House Judiciary Chairman Robert Goodlatte said Page has known for months that the panel has sought her testimony, and the committee will use "all tools at our disposal" to obtain it. If a witness does not respond to a subpoena, the full House can vote to hold her in contempt of Congress.

    "It appears that Lisa Page has something to hide," Goodlatte said."



    Getting fun.

  3. #123
    No, still boring, other than being another illustration of how far house Republicans have fallen. Given their insistence on a closed hearing for Strzok it's more likely house Republicans have something to hide. You're really exposing your Trumpism here, with every post.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  4. #124
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    No, still boring, other than being another illustration of how far house Republicans have fallen. Given their insistence on a closed hearing for Strzok it's more likely house Republicans have something to hide. You're really exposing your Trumpism here, with every post.
    Something to hide? You mean like the person who is violating a congressional subpoena?

  5. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    Something to hide? You mean like the person who is violating a congressional subpoena?
    No, I mean the legislators who refused to let strzok get an open hearing.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  6. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    Something to hide? You mean like the person who is violating a congressional subpoena?
    Why should a subpoena be served in secret?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  7. #127
    subpoena issued on saturday.
    forced to wait 3 hours to review materials related to her interview
    denied said materials
    denied the scope of the interview
    denied a reschedule for after requested materals are produced


    goes to show how far outside the law these people want to operate just to get morons like lewk whipped into a frenzy.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 07-11-2018 at 12:49 PM.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  8. #128
    It's bizarre. Lewk seems to have aged 40 years.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  9. #129
    My god, Gowdy and Goodlatte are truly the biggest jackasses in the entire circus-troupe of jackasses that is the GOP. While it was immensely satisfying to see them both get pimp-slapped by Strzok after their interminable cringeworthy self-important rants, it is extremely unsettling to see the depths to which influential American legislators have fallen. This disease is likely to be incurable.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  10. #130
    You guys have to see these clips:

    https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1017412679126798336

    The best part is that you can see how fucking embarrassed the GOP shills are when their attempts at grandstanding instead lead to having their weakness and ignorance exposed for everyone to see.

    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  11. #131
    Lol

    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  12. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    it is extremely unsettling to see the depths to which influential American legislators have fallen.
    Someone tell them, whatever Trump has on them, it can't possibly be as humiliating as this.
    When the sky above us fell
    We descended into hell
    Into kingdom come

  13. #133
    Gotta catch up but its been enjoyable so far watching him twist his texts into pretzels.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8L7KExI-AA

  14. #134
    They tried, but they failed pretty spectacularly. a because they're really dumb.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  15. #135

  16. #136
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-anti-trump-s/

    "FBI Agent Peter Strzok conspired with his in-house lover to leak anti-Trump stories to the media in spring 2017 when he headed the Russia probe into the Trump campaign, a congressman said on Monday.

    Rep. Mark Meadows, North Carolina Republican, sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein saying a House task force had just received a new shipment of Justice Department documents.

    “Our review of these new documents raises grave concerns regarding an apparent systemic culture of media leaking by high-ranking officials at FBI and DOJ,” Mr. Meadows said. “Review of these new documents suggest a coordinated effort on the part of the FBI and DOJ to release information in the public domain potentially harmful to President Donald Trump’s administration.”

    Mr. Meadows provided an example.

    On April 10, 2017, Mr. Strzok text-messaged Lisa Page, his lover and then-FBI counsel, to discuss a “media leak strategy.”

    “I had literally just gone to find this phone to tell you I want to talk to you about media leak strategy with DOJ before you go,” Mr. Strzok said."




    But of course still nothing to see here, right?

  17. #137
    Amazing how your burden of proof changes depending on who's presenting the evidence.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  18. #138
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...g-trump-report

    So who y'all believe? Rosenstein or Page?

    "The New York Times broke the news about Rosenstein's idea on Friday, characterizing the taping comments as well as talk of invoking the 25th Amendment to the Constitution to oust the president as being legitimate considerations. However, sources in follow-up reports from the Washington Post and NBC News pushed back, saying the covert recording remark was made sarcastically or jokingly.

    But one notable person in the room, Page, thought otherwise. Two sources familiar with the situation said Page, who wrote a memo about that meeting, told the Daily Beast she took the secret taping comment seriously.
    "

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •