Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 47 of 47

Thread: These Monsters should Fry (and even liberals agree!)

  1. #31
    I honestly can't tell if he's joking. I mean if he is, he's fucking hilarious. If not, well
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  2. #32
    You guys realize this is dread yanking your chain, right?
    Faith is Hope (see Loki's sig for details)
    If hindsight is 20-20, why is it so often ignored?

  3. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Being View Post
    You guys realize this is dread yanking your chain, right?
    This forum is basically you, Dread, and Dread's alts, is it?
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by littlelolligagged View Post
    What would you do if a 12 year old murdered someone, then, Lewk?
    Fry em. Might want to wait until he turns 18, its inefficient but less whining about it.

  5. #35
    What the Fuck is it with you and "frying"? Is it just Hank Hill and Texas? Why don't you want to shoot people? Do you want them to suffer? You might want to opt for botched hangings, instead, or drawing their intestines out slowly.
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggy Stardust View Post
    When you say robberies, does that include those who have gambled with other people's monies on Wallstreet?

    Because a thief could never do as much damage as these fuckers have done.
    Touche.

    But Lewk won't respond to that. In his world, white collar crime isn't about bad corporate behavior, or innocent victims. Just free marketeers looking for profits, and stupid people who deserve what they get if they get fleeced.

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Nessus View Post
    What the Fuck is it with you and "frying"? Is it just Hank Hill and Texas?
    Hank Hill would only advocate using the finest propane for frying.

    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    But Lewk won't respond to that.
    He also won't touch the BP issue with a ten foot pole.
    . . .

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Illusions View Post

    He also won't touch the BP issue with a ten foot pole.
    Duly noted. Lewkowskians would rather lay blame on the people building homes below sea level in the Port of New Orleans. Somehow they're stupid for being close to an important commercial hub, with promises of safe harbor from our Army Corps of Engineers. Then, when they get flooded, he can bitch about FEMA. But he never says a damn thing about the civic or national duty a big oil company has, when its operations off-shore can impact a whole nation. How convenient?

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam/Istanbul
    Posts
    12,312
    Quote Originally Posted by Veldan Rath View Post
    I'm too tired to have fun with this one...

    Hazir...LF?
    No, he's been consistently been against government legislating morality.
    Congratulations America

  10. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Hazir View Post
    No, he's been consistently been against government legislating morality.
    No, he's been consistently against government. There IS a difference.

  11. #41
    No, he hasn't. Hazir is right.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  12. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    No, he hasn't. Hazir is right.
    I think Lewk has consistently posted with a general anti-government sentiment, until it suits his agenda. From public education to environmental legislation, he claims to want government to butt out. But he's more than willing to say government should be pro-death penalty, pro-property rights, pro-gun, and pro-militia. Which would mean he's fine with government legislating morality, as long as it fits his own. Feel free to tell me how I'm wrong.

  13. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    I think Lewk has consistently posted with a general anti-government sentiment, until it suits his agenda.
    I.E. He isn't explicitly anti-government.

    Except for your death penalty example, all of those positions are consistent with wanting to minimize the role of the government...
    Hope is the denial of reality

  14. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I.E. He isn't explicitly anti-government.

    Except for your death penalty example, all of those positions are consistent with wanting to minimize the role of the government...
    Okay, that makes sense for Lewk as one example.

    But when does minimizing the role of government become anti-government? Y'know, the Reagan mantra that says when the government comes to help, they really hurt, because gummint is the real enemy.....

  15. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I.E. He isn't explicitly anti-government.

    Except for your death penalty example, all of those positions are consistent with wanting to minimize the role of the government...
    Not the DP. There's little that is more pro-government than allowing them t legally kill citizens. He's also anti-choice, meaning that he wants government control over a woman's uterus.

  16. #46
    If he believes abortion is murder, that would not be an inconsistent position. Different values do conflict with one another, you know.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  17. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by ']['ear View Post
    Not the DP. There's little that is more pro-government than allowing them t legally kill citizens. He's also anti-choice, meaning that he wants government control over a woman's uterus.
    The truth is he wants God to take control of the woman's uterus. But since God won't, he and his fellows feel the government should do it. It's like Islamic extremists and Allah. They believe Allah's angry and mean as hell to the unbelievers. But since Allah never does anything to unbelievers, they just do it themselves, then attribute all their successes to Him.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •