article
Every time a British PM comes back home from a EU summit he (regardless of party-affiliation) seems to have to claim some victory. The same happened this time after a EU summit that was actually mostly about an adjustment to EU monetary policies and the framework in which those policies would have to be enforced. In the margin of that meeting there was also some time reserved for the upcoming EU budget. After the EP and EC had demanded a 6% rise in the EU budget a bunch of governments made clear they thought that was a bad idea in a time that national budgets undergo fierce cuts. Probably most leaders who convened in Brussels were against going with the 6% demand. So it was sort of a foregone conclusion that the counter-offer of the Council would be significantly lower than that 6%. Even if the UK wouldn't have been amongst the countries being against a 6% raise, the Council probably would have come to the same conclusion.
Yet here we have it again; the PM comes back to London and claims to have won a victory. What is it with these people that they even claim issues on which there was concensus and hardly any debate, let alone fighting as a victory? To me it shows that English politicians really have got nobody to blame but themselves when it comes to the level of Euroscepticism in the UK.
The funny part of course is that where it really counted the UK's eurosceptic leader didn't 'win' at all, because it couldn't but agree to a change of the Lisbon Treaty in order for the EMU members to safeguard the euro. Which, as a matter of fact is something the UK isn't supposed to do unless 'powers are returned to London' in return.