Quote Originally Posted by CitizenCain View Post
Except that once images of Dread's drunken debauchery and hairy ball sac are uploaded to the internet, the audience is half the planet and growing, regardless of whether or not it gets touched Google's analytics or automatically tagged by Facebook's algorithms or what have you.
This is horrifically over simplifying it. Lets say in a hypothetical situation, Dread is going up for a job interview and HR is going to do a background check on the internet. Which are they more likely to find? His drunk pictures on the most popular social networking site Facebook, or on page 15 of Google's search results for David Naughtenberg, in Joe's Blog o' Drunk?

So, what to do? Impose a futile ban
Oh why look at that, I actually posted no to banning it, and offered a solution! And its the first sentence of what you quoted! Its almost like you don't read things and instead just slip into some alternate universe of horrible things ultra libertarians hate and start ranting about how awful that place is.