Voters say they’re worse off after four years of Obama, so why is Romney struggling?

[katsung47]

Voters say they’re worse off after fouryears of Obama, so why is Romney struggling?

.By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News 9/19/2012

In the twilight ofPresident Barack Obama's first term, many polls, including a new QuinnipiacUniversity tri-state survey of likely voters, show that most Americans say theyare not better off than they were four years ago. But in those same polls, thepresident retains his edge over challenger Mitt Romney.

That's not normal,says Quinnipiac University pollster Peter A. Brown.

"Most times ifvoters think things haven't gone well, they say, 'Let's think of somebodyelse.' But at this point they're not saying that," Brown said."Clearly they think [Obama] is more in tune with their lives."

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/v...-election.html

Why? Because the USis controlled by the Feds. They control the media and election machine. Theyselect the politicians to control the government. That's why even Clinton did agood job in his last term, Bush won the election. What the Feds needed was nota good economy, they need war and the Patriot Act. Several month after hiselection, 911 happened which satisfied what the Feds needed.

This time, Obamawill give the Feds something Romney can't give. So you saw Romney is under thefire of media despite the life of Americans is worse off after four years reignof Obama.

[Timbuk2]

Heh, I actually opened this up thinking Kat might have started an interesting and topical thread, rather than the usual paranoiac Fed rantings.

[earthJoker]

I knew Roger was awesome but not that Fed has that much influence.

[Dreadnaught]

Closed due to standard SOP of "no more than two kat threads at once".