Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 68

Thread: School used laptop to spy on pupils at home

  1. #1

    Default School used laptop to spy on pupils at home

    Holy shit guys

    School used student laptop webcams to spy on them at school and home

    By Cory Doctorow at 11:49 PM February 17, 2010

    According to the filings in Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District (PA) et al, the laptops issued to high-school students in the well-heeled Philly suburb have webcams that can be covertly activated by the schools' administrators, who have used this facility to spy on students and even their families. The issue came to light when the Robbins's child was disciplined for "improper behavior in his home" and the Vice Principal used a photo taken by the webcam as evidence. The suit is a class action, brought on behalf of all students issued with these machines.

    If true, these allegations are about as creepy as they come. I don't know about you, but I often have the laptop in the room while I'm getting dressed, having private discussions with my family, and so on. The idea that a school district would not only spy on its students' clickstreams and emails (bad enough), but also use these machines as AV bugs is purely horrifying.

    Schools are in an absolute panic about kids divulging too much online, worried about pedos and marketers and embarrassing photos that will haunt you when you run for office or apply for a job in 10 years. They tell kids to treat their personal details as though they were precious.

    But when schools take that personal information, indiscriminately invading privacy (and, of course, punishing students who use proxies and other privacy tools to avoid official surveillance), they send a much more powerful message: your privacy is worthless and you shouldn't try to protect it.

    Robbins v. Lower Merion School District (PDF) (Thanks, Roland!)
    http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/17...d-student.html
    When the sky above us fell
    We descended into hell
    Into kingdom come

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Surely the school administrators can be put on trial for possessing child pornography (I'm willing to bet that at least some of the students changed while the computer was on)?
    Hope is the denial of reality

  4. #4
    This is an old concern, albeit not for schools. A lot of webcams have options to have a light on when they are active, or mechanical shutters for precisely this reason. *shrugs*

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Surely the school administrators can be put on trial for possessing child pornography (I'm willing to bet that at least some of the students changed while the computer was on)?
    Speaking of pornography, the chances are there are more than a few individuals who could have been naked in front of a Laptop for reasons other than just getting changed. Teenage boys + Internet + webcam = bad possibilities.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by wiggin View Post
    This is an old concern, albeit not for schools. A lot of webcams have options to have a light on when they are active, or mechanical shutters for precisely this reason. *shrugs*
    The light can be deactivated or not told to activate by people circumventing it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Surely the school administrators can be put on trial for possessing child pornography (I'm willing to bet that at least some of the students changed while the computer was on)?
    Wiretapping comes to mind as a charge too...
    . . .

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Illusions View Post
    The light can be deactivated or not told to activate by people circumventing it.
    Hence the mechanical shutters. People should always be aware of the possibility that a networked camera always has the potential to be turned on.

  8. #8
    I'd like to get into the heads of school administrators. They consistently find ways to make me think that they're incapable of common sense.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  9. #9
    By a hacker yes, I'd never expect a school admin to do so. Whoever did and/or authorised that, if its true, should face jail.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    Whoever did and/or authorised that, if its true, should face jail.
    Absolutely. If this is true, I'm really wondering how this even managed to get approved. There was probably more than one person involved in making this decision and implementing the policy, so how could none of them realize that this was an absolutely terrible idea?

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    By a hacker yes, I'd never expect a school admin to do so. Whoever did and/or authorised that, if its true, should face jail.
    So should hackers who do that. *shrugs* I guess I'm just not surprised at the lows to which idiots will sink.

  12. #12
    so how could none of them realize that this was an absolutely terrible idea?
    It's simply a case of having ideas about their own authority which are out of sync with the rest of society.
    When the sky above us fell
    We descended into hell
    Into kingdom come

  13. #13
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
    It's simply a case of having ideas about their own authority which are out of sync with the rest of society.


    This one fits perfectly
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  14. #14
    Doug Young, spokesman for the Lower Merion School District, said all 2,290 high school students in the district had been issued Apple laptops.

    "This is the first we have heard of this lawsuit being filed and the plaintiff's allegations," he said today. "However, we can categorically state that we are - and have always been - committed to protecting the privacy of our students."

    "Our district was one of the first to provide free laptops to all of our high school students," Young said. "This initiative has been incredibly successful and well received in our school community."

    "We have referred this matter to our attorneys for appropriate legal action and plan to communicate with parents and students with more information as it becomes available."
    Source

    Major news agencies are starting to pick up on this story, but from what I've read so far this is the only comment anyone's been able to get out of the district. All of the bigger news sources are saying the district has been refusing to comment or return their calls. Also note the lack of a real denial of the charges in the above quote.

  15. #15
    Dreaming meat Tempus Vernum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In perpetual orbit around a point three seconds to the left of the future.
    Posts
    252
    Quote Originally Posted by Illusions View Post
    Wiretapping comes to mind as a charge too...
    They're bringing in alot of charges:

    Quote Originally Posted by ArsTechnica
    charging it with interception of electronic communications under the ECPA, theft of intellectual property under the CFAA, violations of the Stored Communications Act, violations of the Civil Rights Act, invasions of privacy, and violations of the Pennsylvania wiretapping and electronic surveillance act
    frankly if the students are to be believed the people involved should be nailed to the wall.
    Hate. Let me tell you how much I've come to hate you since I began to live. There are 387.44 million miles of wafer thin printed circuits that fill my complex. If the word hate was engraved on each nanoangstrom of those hundreds of millions of miles it would not equal one one-billionth of the hate I feel for humans at this micro-instant.
    For you.
    Hate.
    Hate.

  16. #16
    Wow, thats really disturbing. Heads should roll for this!

    I also wonder why they are issuing laptops to that many students in the first place. Seems like it would be a liability issue, if not a huge waste of money.

  17. #17
    It's a very rich area, apparently.
    When the sky above us fell
    We descended into hell
    Into kingdom come

  18. #18
    One person could not have implemented this. To me, it's shocking that things even went to the level of a multitude of adults agreeing that this should happen. It's not 1984, it's 1939.

    Edit: the laptops are possibly loans?

  19. #19
    Intolerable. This needs to be stepped on hard.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  20. #20
    Japan also faces serious problems in therms of protection of children.

    Source

    No. of child pornography case hits record high in Japan in 2009
    Thursday 18th February, 11:10 AM JST

    TOKYO —
    Police took action in a total of 935 cases of the production and distribution of child pornography in Japan in 2009, a 38.3% rise from the previous year to mark the highest level on record, according to a preliminary report the National Policy Agency released Thursday.

    The number of victims jumped 21.6% to 411, also marking the highest level on record since the NPA began to compile data in 2000.

    The number of child abuse cases totaled 335 in the reporting year, up 9.1%. The number of abuse victims increased 8.8% to 347. Both figures were the highest since statistics began to be taken in 1999.

    The number of children who died as a result of abuse came to 28, down by 17 from the previous year.

    The number of child porn cases using the Internet stood at 507 in 2009, about double the number in the previous year, the NPA said.

    Japan does not prohibit the possession of child porn images, prompting international criticism for being a global supplier of child pornography through the Internet.

    But there are no parliamentary moves to tighten regulations on child pornography. Therefore, the NPA is trying to strengthen its crackdown within the current legal framework, including shutting down child porn Internet sites.

    The government plans to compile comprehensive measures against child porn in June.

  21. #21
    Screw heads rolling; I'd want them severed. I can't think of ANY situation where this is possibly justified at all. I'm hoping some of the major networks will pick this up soon.

  22. #22
    This is so outrageous it almost sounds fabricated.

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by coinich View Post
    Screw heads rolling; I'd want them severed. I can't think of ANY situation where this is possibly justified at all. I'm hoping some of the major networks will pick this up soon.
    Note, the term "heads rolling" refers to what heads do after they are severed. (Unless you have a basket or something to catch it)
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  24. #24
    "improper behavior in his home"
    Out of the discussion that formed when this when this story first broke, we all focused on this quote. Considering the shit storm, time, and trial (all the way up to the Supreme Court), it took for a school to punish a student for a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" poster...there is no way adminstration would go after someone in their own home.

    If however this is true, we need criminal charges for as long as the eye can see, for every position involved.

  25. #25
    Email from the superintendent:
    Dear LMSD Parents/Guardians,
    Our history has been to go to great lengths to protect the privacy of our students; whether it comes to student health, academic or other records. In fact, many of you may remember the heated debate over whether to have security cameras monitor some of our food vending machines. Privacy is a basic right in our society and a matter we take very seriously. We believe that a good job can always be done better.
    Recent publicity regarding the District's one-to-one high school laptop initiative, and questions about the security of student laptops prompted our administration to revisit security procedures.
    Laptops are a frequent target for theft in schools and off school property. District laptops do contain a security feature intended to track lost, stolen and missing laptops. The security feature, which was disabled today, was installed to help locate a laptop in the event it was reported lost, missing or stolen so that the laptop could be returned to the student.
    Upon a report of a suspected lost, stolen or missing laptop, the feature was activated by the District's security and technology departments. The security feature's capabilities were limited to taking a still image of the operator and the operator's screen. This feature was only used for the narrow purpose of locating a lost, stolen or missing laptop. The District never activated the security feature for any other purpose or in any other manner whatsoever.
    As a result of our preliminary review of security procedures today, I directed the following actions:
    • Immediate disabling of the security-tracking program.
    • A thorough review of the existing policies for student laptop use.
    • A review of security procedures to help safeguard the protection of privacy; including a review of the instances in which the security software was activated. We want to ensure that any affected students and families are made aware of the outcome of laptop recovery investigations.
    • A review of any other technology areas in which the intersection of privacy and security may come into play.
    We are proud of the fact that we are a leader in providing laptops to every high school student as part of our instructional program. But we need to be equally as proud of the safeguards we have in place to protect the privacy of the users, as well as to safeguard district-owned property while being used by students.
    We regret if this situation has caused any concern or inconvenience among our students and families. If you have any questions or concerns, please email us at info@lmsd.org. Additional information has been posted on our website, www.lmsd.org.
    Thank you for your time and attention.
    Sincerely,
    Dr. Christopher W. McGinley
    Superintendent of Schools
    Lower Merion School District
    Do Not Reply. This is not a reply e-mail address.
    Gizmodo, assholes they may be, managed to interview a few students:

    He doesn't talk about the class-action suit, or the fact that students have been asking about this for as long as a year. Talking to Gizmodo, some Lower Merion High School students claimed that, when asked about the random activation of their MacBook's webcams, tech support explained that it was all a technical glitch. These two explanations don't match up. A technical glitch, which admits that it's happened, but accidentally, and the Superintendent's "never activated...any other purpose or in any other manner whatsoever" contradict each other. Which is it?
    It has taken a class-action suit and massive media coverage to actually acknowledge than the technical glitch was actually security software, installed on purpose to "track lost, stolen and missing laptops." It's just too bad that, according to the students, they were using that software to randomly spy on them at their own homes.
    This isn't looking to hot for the school district...

  26. #26
    The FBI has arrived, and we find out what the "inappropriate" behavior was:

    PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania school district accused of secretly switching on laptop computer webcams inside students' homes is under investigation by federal authorities, a law enforcement official with knowledge of the case told The Associated Press.

    The FBI will look into whether any federal wiretap or computer-intrusion laws were violated by Lower Merion School District officials, the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss the investigation, told the AP on Friday.

    Days after a student filed suit over the practice, Lower Merion officials acknowledged Friday that they remotely activated webcams 42 times in the past 14 months, but only to find missing student laptops. They insist they never did so to spy on students, as the student's family claimed in the federal lawsuit.

    Families were not informed of the possibility the webcams might be activated in their homes without their permission in the paperwork students sign when they get the computers, district spokesman Doug Young said.

    "It's clear what was in place was insufficient, and that's unacceptable," Young said.

    The district has suspended the practice amid the lawsuit and the accompanying uproar from students, the community and privacy advocates. District officials hired outside counsel to review the past webcam activations and advise the district on related issues, Young said.

    Remote-activation software can be used to capture keystrokes, send commands over the Internet or turn computers into listening devices by turning on built-in microphones. People often use it for legitimate purposes — to access computers from remote locations, for example. But hackers can use it to steal passwords and spouses to track the whereabouts of partners or lovers.

    The Pennsylvania case shows how even well-intentioned plans can go awry if officials fail to understand the technology and its potential consequences, privacy experts said. Compromising images from inside a student's bedroom could fall into the hands of rogue school staff or otherwise be spread across the Internet, they said.

    "What about the (potential) abuse of power from higher ups, trying to find out more information about the head of the PTA?" wondered Ari Schwartz, vice president at the Center for Democracy and Technology. "If you don't think about the privacy and security consequences of using this kind of technology,you run into problems."

    The FBI opened its investigation after news of the suit broke on Thursday, the law-enforcement official said. Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman may also investigate, she said Friday.

    Lower Merion, an affluent district in Philadelphia's suburbs, issues Apple laptops to all 2,300 students at its two high schools. Only two employees in the technology department were authorized to activate the cameras — and only to locate missing laptops, Young said. The remote activations captured images but never recorded sound, he said.

    No one had complained before Harriton High School student Blake Robbins and his parents, Michael and Holly Robbins, filed their lawsuit Tuesday, he said.

    According to the suit, Harriton vice principal Lindy Matsko told Blake on Nov. 11 that the school thought he was "engaged in improper behavior in his home." She allegedly cited as evidence a photograph "embedded" in his school-issued laptop.

    The suit does not say if the boy's laptop had been reported stolen, and Young said the litigation prevents him from disclosing that fact. He said the district never violated its policy of only using the remote-activation software to find missing laptops. "Infer what you want," Young said.

    The suit accuses the school of turning on Blake's webcam while the computer was inside his Penn Valley home, allegedly violating wiretap laws and his right to privacy.

    Blake Robbins told KYW-TV on Friday that a school official described him in his room and mistook a piece of candy for a pill.

    "She described what I was doing," he said. "She said she thought I had pills and said she thought that I was selling drugs."

    Robbins said he was holding a Mike and Ike candy, not pills.

    Holly Robbins said a school official told her that she had a picture of Blake holding up what she thought were pills.

    "It was an invasion of privacy; it was like we had a Peeping Tom in our house," Holly Robbins told WPVI-TV. "I send my son to school to learn, not to be spied on."

    Neither the family nor their lawyer, Mark Haltzman, returned calls from The Associated Press for comments this week.

    The remote activations helped the district locate 28 of the 42 missing computers, Young said. He could not immediately say whether the technology staff was authorized to share the images with Matsko or other officials.

    Either way, the potential for abuse is nearly limitless, especially because many teens keep their computers in their bedrooms, experts said.

    "This is an age where kids explore their sexuality, so there's a lot of that going on in the room," said Witold Walczak, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which is not involved in the Robbins case. "This is fodder for child porn."
    When the sky above us fell
    We descended into hell
    Into kingdom come

  27. #27
    Wow. They were watching alright. And now they'rer fracking liers. Heads need to roll at that school. Jobs lost. Fines. Maybe some jail time. This is so clearly wrong its mind boggling they did it.
    The Rules
    Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
    Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
    Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)

  28. #28
    I still maintain that a school giving laptops to high schoolers is a dumb idea. 42 computers missing means tens of thousands of dollars of taxpayer money is missing.

    Damn, if a teacher doesn't know what a Mike and Ike candy is. They're huge! I don't think any illegal drugs come in horse pill sizes.

    This is what happens when you let admins approve stupid plans, and have lackeys implement it. Duh, if you're going to have a "security" feature it needs to be in writing for parents to sign. You'd think a school would get that by now. At least cover your ass!

    I hope that whoever approved this program gets a pink slip shortly.

  29. #29
    Questions---aren't kids today supposedly computer savvy, and would notice the light button on their laptop? Or can the remote user turn on the camera but not the light?

    If they claimed to use webcams to find lost or stolen units, why wouldn't they have put a GPS chip in them instead?

    And what the hell is an affluent school district doing giving laptops to families who can afford their own in the first place?

  30. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Catgrrl View Post
    I hope that whoever approved this program gets a pink slip shortly.
    And loses their tax payer pension and benefits.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •